Guns are problem because of loses,not because of inability to fight. You don't need gun to kill a man. You need your brain. Ninja centuries ago proved: everything can become a deadly weapon.
Until there is chance resistance shall be peaceful,but Australia is looking so far that using improvised weapons with intention to kill will become or already become justified.
If you want to scare people to submission or fight on equal therms with the enemy infantry you need gun.If you want to kill that don't need to be a gun, all you need is attacking smart way. No guns means high loses in open fight,but not being helpless.
Example: What you can do to enemy with fire extinguisher ? Think. Your brain is your deadliest weapon.We are just peaceful people not used to use it this way. Even pen in your hand can kill without writting a word.Normal pen,not pengun
(how ? this example is close combat.Through eye to brain.Sorry,you are probably not feeling well after reading this isn't it ? If yes it is normal)
Guns are problem because of loses,not because of inability to fight. You don't need gun to kill a man. You need your brain. Ninja centuries ago proved: everything can become a deadly weapon.
Until there is chance resistance shall be peaceful,but Australia is looking so far that using improvised weapons with intention to kill will become or already become justified.
If you want to scare people to submission or fight on equal therms with the enemy infantry you need gun.If you want to kill that don't need to be a gun, all you need is attacking smart way. No guns means high loses in open fight,but not being helpless.
Example: What you can do to enemy with fire extinguisher ? Think. Your brain is your deadliest weapon.We are just peaceful people not used to use it this way. Even pen in your hand can kill without writting a word.Normal pen,not pengun (how ? this example is close combat.Through eye to brain.Sorry,you are probably not feeling well after reading this isn't it ? If yes it is normal)