I believe this is more news cycle theater. I don't believe the FDA will approve the mRNA jab. I'll wait and see.
There's too many legal problems with the FDA approval. Number one problem is that it is not legally a 'vaccine'. This may mean that Pfizer will not have immunity against lawsuits. The Act providing immunity to vaccine companies defines in detail what constitutes a 'vaccine'. Friends, a gene therapy injection doesn't fit ANY of the requirements of a 'vaccine'.
Merriam-Webster and even the CDC may have changed their definition on their website to fool the public. But, the definition for 'vaccine' is provided for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) encoded as 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. This has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
I believe this is more news cycle theater. I don't believe the FDA will approve the mRNA jab. I'll wait and see.
There's too many legal problems with the FDA approval. Number one problem is that it is not legally a 'vaccine'. This may mean that Pfizer will not have immunity against lawsuits. The Act providing immunity to vaccine companies defines in detail what constitutes a 'vaccine'. Friends, a gene therapy injection doesn't fit ANY of the requirements of a 'vaccine'.
They'll do what they always do and just change the definitions.
Merriam-Webster and even the CDC may have changed their definition on their website to fool the public. But, the definition for 'vaccine' is provided for the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) encoded as 42 U.S. Code § 300aa–22. This has not changed and would require an Act of Congress to change it.
That is definitely good to know, thank you!
Your welcome. This is my interpretation after looking into it. Please, look this up for yourself. Prove me wrong. Vet everything.