This is a reply in another thread by another anon and my reply to it.
the original comment:
EmotionallyDrained 1 point 1 hour ago +1 / -0 If your country is at war, and there is no way you can stop all suffering and death but you can save most by sacrificing a "few," would you do it? Could you make that hard choice? Pray for him and all of us.
my reply:
NewbieQbie 1 point moments ago +1 / -0 he basically said as much. He was talking about which state to allow to house the Space Force headquarters and said it was tough choosing, but it had to be done. Then told the crowd something along the lines of "Do you think you could make the decision if you had to? Do you know how tough these things are?" If choosing where to put a military headquarters is tough, IMAGINE choosing to endorse or not endorse a vaccine you needed to facilitate to prevent permanent lockdown of society???
To be honest, i think it was an unforced error on his part. Rarely does he do stupid, but he did here.
No because he's been pushing the vax in various interviews. This wasn't a one-off comment.
If so, that bothers me. Definitely gives me pause.
So let's say he is against the vaccine. Then what?
The cabal has carte blanche justification for permanent lockdowns. No freedoms.
That was the whole point for operation warp speed. Trump said they would take years for a vaccine if it was up to them. Total lockdowns instead.
So Trump obviously has to maintain the charade.
It's not rocket science.
^This. If at any point the vax narrative falters then it's back to lockdowns and the DS original plan of vax development over years while we're all shut away again. Right or wrong he needs to hold the position and trust our free will- the alternative is the true Agenda 21.
Except he's no longer in a position of power. He doesn't have to "maintain" anything. Stumping for a Kill Shot is never justified, no matter how badly you want it to be. It's pure evil at worst, bad politics at best, given his core constituency.