This is a reply in another thread by another anon and my reply to it.
the original comment:
EmotionallyDrained 1 point 1 hour ago +1 / -0 If your country is at war, and there is no way you can stop all suffering and death but you can save most by sacrificing a "few," would you do it? Could you make that hard choice? Pray for him and all of us.
my reply:
NewbieQbie 1 point moments ago +1 / -0 he basically said as much. He was talking about which state to allow to house the Space Force headquarters and said it was tough choosing, but it had to be done. Then told the crowd something along the lines of "Do you think you could make the decision if you had to? Do you know how tough these things are?" If choosing where to put a military headquarters is tough, IMAGINE choosing to endorse or not endorse a vaccine you needed to facilitate to prevent permanent lockdown of society???
Trump has said that you have a choice. I believe he was showing us with operation warp speed, that pharma has the ability to do things in an exponential fashion with vaccines, albeit C-19, cancer, diabetes etc. I also do not think that he has disclosed any support of the 2-3 big name vaccines, only his initiative. He pushed HCQ and Ivermectin. To my knowledge he has still yet to name any of the majors. As with anything that is discussed on this platform, we need to approach everything with the basic scientific method we were taught in school. Develop hypothesis, test (gather data), and conclude. Just my 2 cents.