This is a reply in another thread by another anon and my reply to it.
the original comment:
EmotionallyDrained 1 point 1 hour ago +1 / -0 If your country is at war, and there is no way you can stop all suffering and death but you can save most by sacrificing a "few," would you do it? Could you make that hard choice? Pray for him and all of us.
my reply:
NewbieQbie 1 point moments ago +1 / -0 he basically said as much. He was talking about which state to allow to house the Space Force headquarters and said it was tough choosing, but it had to be done. Then told the crowd something along the lines of "Do you think you could make the decision if you had to? Do you know how tough these things are?" If choosing where to put a military headquarters is tough, IMAGINE choosing to endorse or not endorse a vaccine you needed to facilitate to prevent permanent lockdown of society???
Let's assume Trump has something super advanced like Looking Glass, or at the very least a talented think tank to help him predict the future.
This might have told him that to push the vaccines and then flip flop against them would make him look worse than Fauci. That's probably true, and the media would make sure we never hear the end of it.
There is also the factor that more Democrats are taking the clot shot.
Also, most of the people that survive the depopulation program will be the independent thinkers.
It would bring Trump no advantage to be the first high-profile leader to admit the dangers of the vaccines before "science" does. It could have been his best play to feign ignorance.
He does make it a point to emphasize your freedom of choice. He never fails to include that. It gives the corrupt media nothing to work with.