This is a reply in another thread by another anon and my reply to it.
the original comment:
EmotionallyDrained 1 point 1 hour ago +1 / -0 If your country is at war, and there is no way you can stop all suffering and death but you can save most by sacrificing a "few," would you do it? Could you make that hard choice? Pray for him and all of us.
my reply:
NewbieQbie 1 point moments ago +1 / -0 he basically said as much. He was talking about which state to allow to house the Space Force headquarters and said it was tough choosing, but it had to be done. Then told the crowd something along the lines of "Do you think you could make the decision if you had to? Do you know how tough these things are?" If choosing where to put a military headquarters is tough, IMAGINE choosing to endorse or not endorse a vaccine you needed to facilitate to prevent permanent lockdown of society???
Understand that from my perspective, it's not just you assuming there's stuff going on that you can't see. It's also ignoring stuff that you CAN see, but you choose to dismiss as optics or outright falsehoods.
So when I dissect the theories here, it's not just because I'm trying to "see" the stuff you claim I can't see. It's because I'm also trying to reconcile how these theories would work versus what we actually see happening.
Science and logic is about being able to accurately predict the future. I so far have been able to do so much more accurately by using what I can see than what I can't and have to have faith in.
I also find Q people calling themselves non-fatalists to be kind of interesting. You don't believe that "NCSWIC" is fatalistic? That "the storm is coming" is fatalistic? "We have it all." That sort of thing? Much of the frustration around here doesn't seem to be in response to the belief that the Plan has failed, but that it is incapable of failing and that everyone just wants it to become obvious to everyone outside of Q world by now.