You are asking to infect a human with an isolated sample, iow, to commit war crimes.
Strawman argument.
Where is the research to show that "substance X" makes people/animals have "Y symptoms."
I have never seen that study.
Your strawman is also the reason Pfizer gave its experimental drug to the "control" (placebo) group as well as the test group. Both groups got the drug, which renders the trial meaningless.
You are the one making the claim.
You cite a paper that shows how they compared a sample to a pre-existing genome sequence.
I am asking where that pre-existing sequence came from.
You say "look at the references."
No, you show which reference of the many cited is for that specific issue.
Strawman argument.
Where is the research to show that "substance X" makes people/animals have "Y symptoms."
I have never seen that study.
Your strawman is also the reason Pfizer gave its experimental drug to the "control" (placebo) group as well as the test group. Both groups got the drug, which renders the trial meaningless.
BTW: stop being a prick.