It’s always been about the testing, a fruit tested positive, a sheep tested positive, they didn’t isolate the virus, they didn’t use the virus to create the PCR test, this is why the CDC and the FDA admitted that there are false positives and they are changing the test - The Great Awakening

It’s always been about the testing, a fruit tested positive, a sheep tested positive, they didn’t isolate the virus, they didn’t use the virus to create the PCR test, this is why the CDC and the FDA admitted that there are false positives and they are changing the test (dailycaller.com)

posted 3 years ago by penisse 3 years ago by penisse +466 / -0

59 comments

59 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (59)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– MAG768720 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

This took one minute to find where you can order isolated samples for research. I would have as many as I spent minutes searching.

https://www.beiresources.org/Catalog/animalviruses/NR-52281.aspx

"Each vial contains approximately 0.5 mL of cell lysate and supernatant from Cercopithecus aethiops kidney cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, isolate USA-WA1/2020."

That is not an isolated/purified sample of SARS-CoV-2.

Do you not see "kidney cells?"

It only took you one minute to find it because you did not bother to read what it says.

Let's get you a "not a researcher" flair.

Just can't stop being a condescending prick, huh?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

▲ 1 ▼

– MAG768720 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

clear evidence

You show me kidney cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, and you think that is clear evidence of a sample of SARS-CoV-2 isolated and purified?

It is not. If you think it is, then there is no point to further discussion of this.

BTW, I at least gave you the respect of reading through the things you cited. You did not show me the same respect. Can't have a "debate" that is one-sided.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– deleted 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q