That is the whole purpose of its approval. They clearly stated such when telling us the approval was coming. They said it will make it easier for companies to mandate it. They also said it would convince a lot of the vaccine hesitant since so many refuse until it is approved. The problem of course is this new rating has no meaning in reality since it’s ‘approval’ absolutely does not follow any previous protocols.
Let the law suits begin - - and not just against Pfizer. All medical and places of employment that mandates the vaccine should now be liable for bad outcomes.
They're just doing it now to undercut all the lawsuits, which argue against the legality of mandates under EUA status. It will be worst for the military, college students, teachers and medical workers---until we get lawsuits going with updated arguments.
On a more positive note, FDA approval should make additional information on the vaccine available, and Pfizer won't be able to change formulations (like I think they may be doing).
FDA approval should make additional information on the vaccine available
This is true. But Pfizer left their key ingredient, graphine oxide of the US patent so people who read the fine print won't see this toxic ingredient on the list.
My understanding is that after FDA approval, what's in the vial must match the approved formula or they can be sued for malfeasance. Under EUA, they can put anything they want into the formula---including graphene, saline, etc. Any deviation from what was approved has to go through the whole process again.
So now, we're in this insane (but maybe good for us!) situation, where the vaccine doesn't work against the variants. Since there's an FDA approved drug, which is "safe and effective," no additional new "vaccine" drugs can come in under an EUA, unless it's declared "unsafe" and "ineffective."
That is the whole purpose of its approval. They clearly stated such when telling us the approval was coming. They said it will make it easier for companies to mandate it. They also said it would convince a lot of the vaccine hesitant since so many refuse until it is approved. The problem of course is this new rating has no meaning in reality since it’s ‘approval’ absolutely does not follow any previous protocols.
Any day now military, any day
Will not comply!!!!
Play the card dickhead and then We the People will play ours.
Let the law suits begin - - and not just against Pfizer. All medical and places of employment that mandates the vaccine should now be liable for bad outcomes.
They're just doing it now to undercut all the lawsuits, which argue against the legality of mandates under EUA status. It will be worst for the military, college students, teachers and medical workers---until we get lawsuits going with updated arguments.
On a more positive note, FDA approval should make additional information on the vaccine available, and Pfizer won't be able to change formulations (like I think they may be doing).
This is true. But Pfizer left their key ingredient, graphine oxide of the US patent so people who read the fine print won't see this toxic ingredient on the list.
My understanding is that after FDA approval, what's in the vial must match the approved formula or they can be sued for malfeasance. Under EUA, they can put anything they want into the formula---including graphene, saline, etc. Any deviation from what was approved has to go through the whole process again.
So now, we're in this insane (but maybe good for us!) situation, where the vaccine doesn't work against the variants. Since there's an FDA approved drug, which is "safe and effective," no additional new "vaccine" drugs can come in under an EUA, unless it's declared "unsafe" and "ineffective."