I think you are agreeing with me?

I'll say it differently. You need to source a ton of info to train your pattern recognition. A lot of the info you read will be wrong, true, but it will give you perspective.

Think of this process as the scientific method. You won't be able to find the truth. You can only learn to identify more and more lies.

If you're pulling in lots of info, it will allow you to start seeing broken patterns in the official narrative. You won't be able to do this by reading acceptable information sources, because those have been curated.

Most of the information here is partially accurate at best. But what you'll find is that the mainstream info is also partially accurate at best. The only difference is we're trained to be skeptical of one and trained to accept the other. Not just the info itself, but the methodology behind it (ex: falsifiability).

Once you wade through enough nonsense, you will achieve a level of accuracy and "falsifiability." But its different than the standard way we think about it.

You will be able to predict events to some degree.

Example: There will be a domestic terror incident. You will be able to predict the perpetrator and also predict the media response (which doesn't match).

Example: You will read a statistical report and get a sense for which numbers have been gamed. If you dig deep, you can verify this gut feel in most cases.

This is a numbers game. We're using statistics. You may be wrong some of the time, but once you've been right 10, 20, 50 times it all becomes very predictable.

Just remember, you can't use straight logic or "facts" to do this, because those have been hacked. You must build your awareness of alt forms of information. This trains your intuition to wake up to new patterns that you were previously unaware of, which allows you to spot false info better, although the levels here are so deep that I doubt anybody knows what's actually happening.

Again, welcome to the forum!