Not the same, what you're referring to is ADE: antibody dependent enhancement.
ADE in a nutshell is where the programmed immune response by the mRNA "vaccine" is inadequate and your antibodies bind to the virus but don't kill it.
Our cell walls have a complex chemical gating system, but when those walls detect our own body's cells (like the antibodies attached to the corona viruses), the drawbridge gets lowered allowing the corona virus to swarm into the cell and hijack/kill it. The result is an organism that's now incredibly vulnerable to the virus that the vaccine was ostensibly supposed to fight. This is one of the many reasons why it's important for all the Leftards out there to understand that this "vaccine" is very different in that it's not using weakened or dead virus in the injection.
Past vaccines of course have used weakened or dead virus and consequently, the immune response is IDENTICAL to actually encountering the live virus.
What they're referring to in this paper is the phenomenon of cytokine storms (inflammation) that's set off by the damn spike protein in this "vaccine". Inflammation destroys tissue and that's particularly bad when the inflammation is occurring in cardiac tissue (as we've seen with many young men after the jab) or brain tissue (or any organ for that matter).
Not the same, what you're referring to is ADE: antibody dependent enhancement.
ADE in a nutshell is where the programmed immune response by the mRNA "vaccine" is inadequate and your antibodies bind to the virus but don't kill it.
Our cell walls have a complex chemical gating system, but when those walls detect our own body's cells (like the antibodies attached to the corona viruses), the drawbridge gets lowered allowing the corona virus to swarm into the cell and hijack/kill it. The result is an organism that's now incredibly vulnerable to the virus that the vaccine was ostensibly supposed to fight. This is one of the many reasons why it's important for all the Leftards out there to understand that this "vaccine" is very different in that it's not using weakened or dead virus in the injection.
Past vaccines of course have used weakened or dead virus and consequently, the immune response is IDENTICAL to actually encountering the live virus.
What they're referring to in this paper is the phenomenon of cytokine storms (inflammation) that's set off by the damn spike protein in this "vaccine". Inflammation destroys tissue and that's particularly bad when the inflammation is occurring in cardiac tissue (as we've seen with many young men after the jab) or brain tissue (or any organ for that matter).