Why is Trump pushing the vaccines? This X22report/PrayingMedic post is one theory (see stickied comment)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (194)
sorted by:
Praying Medic:
Dave from X22 Report brought up a point tonight I had never considered.
Many people want to know why Trump pushes vaccines.
Why does he want them to be rushed? Why not allow the normal time for clinical trials? What's the hurry? It doesn't make sense.
Remember when Trump argued with Congress for 2 years to get a wall built on the southern border? All the while, he had secretly planned to build and fund the wall using the military.
By creating a public debate with Congress, he proved to the public the fact that they support drug trafficking, human trafficking and weapons trafficking.
What if Trump has an ulterior motive for rushing covid vaccines to market?
What risk do pharmaceutical companies bear if they market drugs that have not been adequately tested for safety?
How much money in damages do you think they might be liable for over the next 10 years? What risk toes the FDA assume? What about the CDC?
Is Trump allowing members of the medical technocracy to dig their own graves?
It has been my belief that one reason Trump backed the fast development and release of a covid vaccine was to end the lockdowns, which saved us from financial collapse. If it is also true that he did it to goad big pharma into assuming massive legal risk, leading to their financial ruin, it may be the most brilliant tactical move of his political career.
The flaw with the theory that Trump set up vaccine manufacturers to assume legal liability is that vaccine manufacturers have been given immunity against damages. If you take that at face value and look no further it throws cold water on the idea.
But there's more to the story. Immunity is not a cut and dry issue. There are limitations. As Newsweek pointed out in this article, immunity is granted unless there is "willful misconduct" by the company.
Given what we know about pharmaceutical companies, and given the fact that they're offered immunity, what do you suppose the odds are that they might engage in willful misconduct, such as falsifying research data?
Immunity often acts as an enticement to commit fraud. All a plaintiff needs is evidence of willful misconduct.
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-are-pharmaceutical-companies-immune-covid-19-vaccine-lawsuits-1562793
Remember that word press site Cat? Go read through the vaccine stuff.
I think there's a lot behind the scenes we aren't seeing they're trying to drive us all by fear.
But I leave it for you to decide for yourself.
Just remember Geotus has the bigger picture of everything.
If you bring together a solid, high-info post, I'd be happy to sticky it, pede. Best
Ok it probably won't be until Friday my schedule is really full but I will do that. There's a lot to unpack in what I've seen I spend hours and hours on the wordpress site.
It's why I try to get people to learn the coms because we need to so that once this operation is done, the ds won't be able to get away with it again, because we'll be on to those f ers.
I think there was a Q post saying the same thing for us to learn their coms so we know what they're doing.
willful misconduct would include such things as:
1 causing /colluding with groups responsible for actually causing the disease in the first place
2 knowing full well that the vaccine actually helps promote the delta variant (or other strains)
3 promoting use of "boosters" every 3 months to reap in profits, and also possibly knowing of simple cheap cures, and colluding to spread disinformation about other cheap cures
If any 2 of these are provable (in a court) I would say they would certainly lose any immunity
< willful misconduct, such as falsifying research data
Interesting point.
THIS! 👆
I agree with u/catsfive & Dave Hayes (Praying Medic)
Well, well, well.... love this board! Learn something, a lot of things, everyday here. Didn’t know provable willful misconduct can Trump immunity! Thank you for this. Adds another dimension to the story and what the ultimate strategy was.
Woo! We love our patriots.
That’s great... but first, let’s talk about your health.
I can’t hep myself, sorry. Kek!
A critical post for this conversation: https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwVmggeE/bombshell-karen-kingston-on-stee/
“It’s the end of the pharmaceutical industry as we know it.” 6:42 “Brilliant strategist (Trump) choking on their own greed. “Two weeks and counting”
You should look over all the discussions about Operation Warp Speed and what it might mean......
The points you raise or Dave have been discussed on the boards and to some extent here too....
It’s well worth a read up and will help with bigger picture mate...
WWG1WGA
"Fraud vitiates everything" 🤔
So...the theory is that he pushed deadly vaccines that will hurt other people, just to see if the CDC/Pfizer will face legal consequences (which they won't)? How many people sacrificed before it's no longer worth it?
Criminal malfeasance.
Big hopium!
Shitty theory. That would mean that Trump in telling people they should get vaccinated is knowingly misleading many who will do what he says at his word (even if it’s just 5% of his supporters) into death and other harm.
Sorry, bullshit theory. Plus Pfizer is specifically immune (unless they are hiding information, which has nothing to do with his theory), and the FDA is s government agency so a lawsuit against the fda causes no harm to the fda, it just takes money from taxes from everyone to pay those who sued.
I have a theory......What if under operation warp speed there was a "vaccine" that was hcq and zinc and all the other shit that works. Then when Trump left they switched the vaccines. POTUS is 100% insulated.. what if he's playing coy until it is confirmed that the "vaccines" weren't the ones he put out? That would be the class action suit of a lifetime. just a thought. and I do have. lil sprinkle of autism.
Oh, purlease! Sometimes things are what they appear to be. Trump supports them because he believes in them and wants the credit. He could have fired Fauci but didn't.
I don't believe for a second that Trump would willingly encourage the public around the world to get hurt or worse, simply to take down Big Pharma. He would rather warn against it, and be on the right side of history.
I think he really tried to bring forward a good product by clearing out the red tape as quickly as possible. That being said, I believe Big Pharma took advantage of him and produced something that would never have been approved in the previous process, allowing the public to assume the risk of bad medicine.
But when it comes to big pharma / big tech / big anything, interpreting Business as Usual as "willful misconduct" will never be a slam dunk. Scientists are probably already queued up to be called on for any possible legal testimony, they are bought and paid for to run interference in the legal setting. They could explain away any apparent falsified data.