The problem is the way people are framing the argument. Banning companies from requiring it is the wrong perspective. She is correct that dictating what private companies can and can not do is a slippery slope. The field there is too wide open for later abuse.
Instead, we should be protecting the right to work of individuals who do not want to take it. This country has a long history of outlawing discriminatory practices in hiring. Looked at this way, it is a very small addition to an already well established cultural mandate. No slope to worry about. It is a flat plane. If you already can't discriminate on basis of religion, why should you be allowed to discriminate on the basis of participation in gene therapy experiments?
There are already supposed to be religious exemptions. We only need to clarify that companies must grant those exemptions to those who do not want the jab.
Can you mandate that people smoke cigarettes all day long, as an employer? The problem with allowing this is that the "vaccine" is still in clinical trials, long term side effects are unknown and also has a slight side effect of DEATH. Companies should not be able to require a condition of employment something which may cause people to die.
She also opposed a bill in Feb 2020 that would prohibit schools from mandating a vaccine. "You can work elsewhere", "You can learn elsewhere", "You can shop elsewhere" does not stand up logically if what is being mandated has a side effect of DEATH and other terrible outcomes, with long term effects unknown.
The problem is the way people are framing the argument. Banning companies from requiring it is the wrong perspective. She is correct that dictating what private companies can and can not do is a slippery slope. The field there is too wide open for later abuse.
Instead, we should be protecting the right to work of individuals who do not want to take it. This country has a long history of outlawing discriminatory practices in hiring. Looked at this way, it is a very small addition to an already well established cultural mandate. No slope to worry about. It is a flat plane. If you already can't discriminate on basis of religion, why should you be allowed to discriminate on the basis of participation in gene therapy experiments?
There are already supposed to be religious exemptions. We only need to clarify that companies must grant those exemptions to those who do not want the jab.
Can you mandate that people smoke cigarettes all day long, as an employer? The problem with allowing this is that the "vaccine" is still in clinical trials, long term side effects are unknown and also has a slight side effect of DEATH. Companies should not be able to require a condition of employment something which may cause people to die.
She also opposed a bill in Feb 2020 that would prohibit schools from mandating a vaccine. "You can work elsewhere", "You can learn elsewhere", "You can shop elsewhere" does not stand up logically if what is being mandated has a side effect of DEATH and other terrible outcomes, with long term effects unknown.