The licensed vaccine has the same formulation as the EUA-authorized vaccine and the products
can be used interchangeably to provide the vaccination series without presenting any safety or
effectiveness concerns. The products are legally distinct with certain differences that do not impact
safety or effectiveness
That does change things. I have no idea what those distinctions are. They are not clear from the other document. The ingredients listed are identical. The approved vaccine is by serial number, and the numbers match.
Legally distinct however means what you suggest; that the Pfizer that is out there now, and the COMIRNTY are distinct, and if it is mandated through the justification of it no longer being experimental one can insist on the COMIRNTY and reject the Pfizer. I'm not sure if that's important, but it may buy some time for some.
FYI: I'm officially changing the name of COMIRNTY to Comorbidity. In addition to making it easier to say and type, I am going to save the CDC some time with this name change. That way when they blame all the deaths COMIRNTY causes due to pathogenic priming on the virus, they can instead list them as Comorbidity deaths. It should help with their fear graphs.
I personally use commiRnaughty. I believe this is only a mechanism to buy time,until/if comirnaty shows up in the US. I did some searches and see no press deleases of shipments and find none available in the US. Using this argument might also wake some folks that this was a giant psyop to encourage mandating unnaproved vaxes.
OK, you win with CommieRnaughty. In addition to being a very accurate description of the vaccine, I can't even look at it now without saying that in my head.
Now this is interesting:
(bottom of page 1) from your second link above.
Legally distinct...
That does change things. I have no idea what those distinctions are. They are not clear from the other document. The ingredients listed are identical. The approved vaccine is by serial number, and the numbers match.
Legally distinct however means what you suggest; that the Pfizer that is out there now, and the COMIRNTY are distinct, and if it is mandated through the justification of it no longer being experimental one can insist on the COMIRNTY and reject the Pfizer. I'm not sure if that's important, but it may buy some time for some.
FYI: I'm officially changing the name of COMIRNTY to Comorbidity. In addition to making it easier to say and type, I am going to save the CDC some time with this name change. That way when they blame all the deaths COMIRNTY causes due to pathogenic priming on the virus, they can instead list them as Comorbidity deaths. It should help with their fear graphs.
I personally use commiRnaughty. I believe this is only a mechanism to buy time,until/if comirnaty shows up in the US. I did some searches and see no press deleases of shipments and find none available in the US. Using this argument might also wake some folks that this was a giant psyop to encourage mandating unnaproved vaxes.
OK, you win with CommieRnaughty. In addition to being a very accurate description of the vaccine, I can't even look at it now without saying that in my head.