Sounds like it was written as a guidebook for state courts to fight back against "common law courts" and "sovereign citizens." It notes various individuals, laws, the "missing" 13th amendment, arguments made by sovereign citizens, American flag with the yellow/golden fringe, and what courts could possibly do in answer to sovereign citizens.
I personally believe that "judges" are tyrants in black robes, and by their actions and title, would be better referred to with a title of nobility, like "your majesty" or "your highness" or "my liege" or "sire." It would probably piss them off to no end, maybe causing them to have a stroke.
What do you all think? It's a long, old page with more text for citations than "tactics" and arguments against sovereign citizens.
Definitely provided my reading material for the night (and maybe tommorrow night).
Through the preface: Not picking up a cavalier tone, writer seems to be somewhat respectful, telling me there been some success using common law defenses.
As for judges I'm sure it varies, only local judge I've experienced (jury duty) was truthfully awesome...granted it was probably the mildest(no real victim) trial and not in any way political or pressuring for him. The pressure is what leads to corruption.
Are you to be ground in the crucible? Or shall ye be come a diamond and turn the tables? (quote from me, just now...afaik)
What's an "awesome" judge?
lol I walked myself into a corner there...can't really back-up the awesome modifier, but he was in control in a good way. It wasn't a cold atmosphere (and judges are pretty much in control of the atmosphere).
I don't know but two of my great greats were french nobility.
Well the '3 Kings from the East' were called 'Magi' from the Persian, paralleling words like magus (Zoroastrian priest/magician/wise man).
This also relates to the English word 'master' (Latin magister), which is reflected in the judicial term magistrate.