You can't tell a hostile audience the truth. You can only show the evidence. The best way to show the evidence is with minimal narrative. Asking questions in earnest is much more powerful than making statements. Asking guiding questions Q style, with implication is also powerful. Injecting biases as questions and/or stating your own lack of certainty within that bias leaves the door open for an otherwise hostile viewpoint to give their opinion. The knowledge that they will be heard, that my mind is not closed to what they have to say, gives them license to listen to what I have to say. Once you close the door on the opposition, the opposition stops listening. It's taken a fair bit of time to develop that skill, and I am far from mastery,.

Here is the first part of my report if you are curious. I will be rewriting it based on feedback I have received from non-GME people. I will do that after I finish the second part, which should be a few days. This version has too many specific references that only the GME community will get, though I think the larger picture is clear, while being very normie friendly. The rewrite should remove all those GME specific references and create an intro, ending, and a couple internal motivators to make it more engaging to a common audience.