He doesn't like Dr. Frank but his argument wasn't all that compelling. He stole Bobby Piton's work - no evidence presented. He stabbed Lindell in the back? No evidence presented.

I think Pulitzer let his personal distaste for Frank infect him here. His argument would also be more persuasive if his podcast wasn't loaded with self-promotion ads about his name and family history. I have been concerned with his grandstanding and inclination to promote himself, but I have been convinced he is pursuing truth with respect to the audits. But I don't think he did himself or the cause any good with this.