I can't figure out the truth of this. If you go somewhere like Ars Technicana, it says
"In the US, over 200 million doses of Comirnaty have been administered since it initially earned an EUA on December 11, 2020."
So which is true - is it just rebranded for USA now being called this and has been administered in many doses already, or is this a -different- vaccine only available in Europe/etc and NOT related to the Pfizer dose being issues in the states historically and presently?
To my understanding what seems to matter is the dates.
Even if they decided to just change the name of the same product, the product in circulation would still have a date of production that pre dates the approval.
As seen with what you describe though, it gives outlets like Ars Technica a way to say it is "approved" when the fine print says otherwise.
Ars is a woke cesspit and has been for a long time.
Anyway, they call it that because while it's technically physically the same substance, the statement 100% bullshit because it didn't say Comirnaty on the bottle and you won't be able to sue Pfizer if your dick falls off after the injection.
I can’t really answer your question but I mentioned this post to my wife, who works in public health here in South Africa, and she brought up their documentation that has the pfizer vax listed as Comirnaty.
I can't figure out the truth of this. If you go somewhere like Ars Technicana, it says
"In the US, over 200 million doses of Comirnaty have been administered since it initially earned an EUA on December 11, 2020."
So which is true - is it just rebranded for USA now being called this and has been administered in many doses already, or is this a -different- vaccine only available in Europe/etc and NOT related to the Pfizer dose being issues in the states historically and presently?
Here's the truth: [they] are lying about it all.
and lying out of both sides of their face...they are dispensing cognitive dissonance because it is proven to be effective
To my understanding what seems to matter is the dates.
Even if they decided to just change the name of the same product, the product in circulation would still have a date of production that pre dates the approval.
As seen with what you describe though, it gives outlets like Ars Technica a way to say it is "approved" when the fine print says otherwise.
Ars is a woke cesspit and has been for a long time.
Anyway, they call it that because while it's technically physically the same substance, the statement 100% bullshit because it didn't say Comirnaty on the bottle and you won't be able to sue Pfizer if your dick falls off after the injection.
I can’t really answer your question but I mentioned this post to my wife, who works in public health here in South Africa, and she brought up their documentation that has the pfizer vax listed as Comirnaty.
I have seen a vaccination passport/certificate here in Denmark, which also said Comirnaty.