The ENTIRE EVIL EMPIRE needs to GO DOWN..."BILLIONAIRE"
Your consent to what they suggest is what sustains the entire evil empire. In this case...your consent to evaluate the suggested value of money by choice to believe it being worth "billions" is what makes larry lucky.
Uhhh... i'm pretty sure the entire point of this is that he was so "lucky" because, incidentally, just that day, him and his entire family had things happen that prevented them from being in the twin towers when the shit went down..
Also that he, incidentally, had just weeks prior concluded a massive insurance policy that specifically included "terrorist attacks"
i'm pretty sure the entire point of this is that he was so "lucky" because, incidentally, just that day, him and his entire family had things happen that prevented them from being in the twin towers when the shit went down..
You're not "pretty sure"; you consented to a contradicting narrative suggested to you by the same source that suggested you the mainstream narrative. The first narrative (9/11 terrorist attack) suggested puts those who chose to believe it against those who chose to not believe it. The resulting conflict is called "reason" and the whole operating tool of control is called "division by suggestion".
After the conflict of reason was establish and the majority divided into reasoning about true versus false; the few start to suggest contradictions to both sides within reason, which is why the believers get "9/11 was an inside job and dancing israelis" and the non-believers get "lucky larry; inflated airplane tires; building seven did not kill itself; staples boxcutters; Osama Ben Obama etc."
The sustenance of reason through suggested contradictions is called "talmudic reasoning".
The trick underneath all this is that our free will of choice represents a reaction to balance; which our parasites exploit by deceiving us through suggestions to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice.
When others suggest to believe or not-believe anything; they use their free will of choice to offer a suggested choice to your free will of choice, and when you consent; you choose to ignore your choice within balance for submission to their choice in ignorance of balance.
he is rich
The so called rich don't pay with money; because they already own everything they tricked others to believe costs money. The majority of our species is defined by the few as being within world wide poverty aka not having money, and yet breeding like cockroaches; while those who chase money are being ethnically cleansed through "Replacement Migration" based on insufficient birthrates (according to the few).
Should I mention that no other life-forms use money to sustain themselves within reality? Those who chase money are ignoring this blissfully; while complaining about the struggle to survive; which they believe is about getting access to "muh precious" money.
The trick underneath that one is that the highest value in ALL existence represents ONEs choice to evaluate it. Balance holds ALL value; choice reacts by evaluation for balancing. The suggested value of money by others a) ignores balance of value; b) devalues the choice of evaluation of those who consent to it and c) allows the few who suggest substitute value to the many; through the consent of the many to define value for the many; which they used usury for to accumulate all consented to value into the hands of the few; while now putting it all behind a paywall of compliance for the many.
Compliance to the few as rulers? Nah; they already are. It's compliance to self destruction for access to participation in reality...a reality the many are ignoring with their own free will of choice.
Your consent to what they suggest is what sustains the entire evil empire. In this case...your consent to evaluate the suggested value of money by choice to believe it being worth "billions" is what makes larry lucky.
Uhhh... i'm pretty sure the entire point of this is that he was so "lucky" because, incidentally, just that day, him and his entire family had things happen that prevented them from being in the twin towers when the shit went down..
Also that he, incidentally, had just weeks prior concluded a massive insurance policy that specifically included "terrorist attacks"
And not just because he is rich...
You're not "pretty sure"; you consented to a contradicting narrative suggested to you by the same source that suggested you the mainstream narrative. The first narrative (9/11 terrorist attack) suggested puts those who chose to believe it against those who chose to not believe it. The resulting conflict is called "reason" and the whole operating tool of control is called "division by suggestion".
After the conflict of reason was establish and the majority divided into reasoning about true versus false; the few start to suggest contradictions to both sides within reason, which is why the believers get "9/11 was an inside job and dancing israelis" and the non-believers get "lucky larry; inflated airplane tires; building seven did not kill itself; staples boxcutters; Osama Ben Obama etc."
The sustenance of reason through suggested contradictions is called "talmudic reasoning".
The trick underneath all this is that our free will of choice represents a reaction to balance; which our parasites exploit by deceiving us through suggestions to ignore balance/choice for choice vs choice.
When others suggest to believe or not-believe anything; they use their free will of choice to offer a suggested choice to your free will of choice, and when you consent; you choose to ignore your choice within balance for submission to their choice in ignorance of balance.
The so called rich don't pay with money; because they already own everything they tricked others to believe costs money. The majority of our species is defined by the few as being within world wide poverty aka not having money, and yet breeding like cockroaches; while those who chase money are being ethnically cleansed through "Replacement Migration" based on insufficient birthrates (according to the few).
Should I mention that no other life-forms use money to sustain themselves within reality? Those who chase money are ignoring this blissfully; while complaining about the struggle to survive; which they believe is about getting access to "muh precious" money.
The trick underneath that one is that the highest value in ALL existence represents ONEs choice to evaluate it. Balance holds ALL value; choice reacts by evaluation for balancing. The suggested value of money by others a) ignores balance of value; b) devalues the choice of evaluation of those who consent to it and c) allows the few who suggest substitute value to the many; through the consent of the many to define value for the many; which they used usury for to accumulate all consented to value into the hands of the few; while now putting it all behind a paywall of compliance for the many.
Compliance to the few as rulers? Nah; they already are. It's compliance to self destruction for access to participation in reality...a reality the many are ignoring with their own free will of choice.