Wouldn’t it be the doctors & pharmacists that should file lawsuits? To file as a common person it would be dismissed as we do not have standing. What I noticed this morning was that there are school boards, pharmacy boards, medical boards etc. All these little boards with little tyrants sitting on them exerting control over our lives.
State medical, nursing, pharmacy, and dental boards exist to protect the public by controlling the licensing of providers that involves requirements of license issuance and disciplinary action against a license holder. Actually, those forgotten but all important boards should be named as defendants along with other state and county medical and public health entities in class action suits filed by members of the public since the mandate of the boards is to protect the public health. The public are the ones that must take them on and demand change. Licensed providers can be support for those law suits.
Just like the battles that everyone else is fighting in the courts on the illegality of actions based on bad "science," the health care community takes its guidance from the AMA, CDC, FDA, HHS, and others. A state medical board can only operate within the "evidence based" guidelines as set down by those entities in determining whether or not a license holder stepped outside of the boundaries of a recognized standard of care. Usually an action is taken against a particular licensee due to a complaint filed - mostly from the public or an institution, such as a hospital.
As far as that larger medical community is concerned, there are large numbers of health care workers that are fighting back and many are losing their jobs and careers for taking a stand. This will have little effect on state licensing boards. They are controlled by State Legislative processes through Medical Practice Acts voted on by lawmakers after public debate and consent - in other words, the people. So, unless there is outcry from the public when practitioners are targeted and threatened with losing their license for offering treatments that the powers to be in the ivory towers do not approve, nothing will change. Those boards are there for the public - or at least they are supposed to be. The public needs to demand change because they are ultimately the ones that control the Legislature and thereby the boards. Did you see the Ohio case about a judge that ordered a hospital to treat with Ivermectin? The pushback must rise from the public - you get the healthcare you demand.
Not when it is paid for by Pharmaceutical companies. Medical professionals with integrity & a real understanding of science are walking away from their jobs. In Oregon the NG was called up to work positions in hospitals. More need to walk away.
Wouldn’t it be the doctors & pharmacists that should file lawsuits? To file as a common person it would be dismissed as we do not have standing. What I noticed this morning was that there are school boards, pharmacy boards, medical boards etc. All these little boards with little tyrants sitting on them exerting control over our lives.
State medical, nursing, pharmacy, and dental boards exist to protect the public by controlling the licensing of providers that involves requirements of license issuance and disciplinary action against a license holder. Actually, those forgotten but all important boards should be named as defendants along with other state and county medical and public health entities in class action suits filed by members of the public since the mandate of the boards is to protect the public health. The public are the ones that must take them on and demand change. Licensed providers can be support for those law suits.
^^^ This!!
I disagree. They are part of the larger community as well and need to bring the concerns & proof documents to their boards on these therapies.
Just like the battles that everyone else is fighting in the courts on the illegality of actions based on bad "science," the health care community takes its guidance from the AMA, CDC, FDA, HHS, and others. A state medical board can only operate within the "evidence based" guidelines as set down by those entities in determining whether or not a license holder stepped outside of the boundaries of a recognized standard of care. Usually an action is taken against a particular licensee due to a complaint filed - mostly from the public or an institution, such as a hospital.
As far as that larger medical community is concerned, there are large numbers of health care workers that are fighting back and many are losing their jobs and careers for taking a stand. This will have little effect on state licensing boards. They are controlled by State Legislative processes through Medical Practice Acts voted on by lawmakers after public debate and consent - in other words, the people. So, unless there is outcry from the public when practitioners are targeted and threatened with losing their license for offering treatments that the powers to be in the ivory towers do not approve, nothing will change. Those boards are there for the public - or at least they are supposed to be. The public needs to demand change because they are ultimately the ones that control the Legislature and thereby the boards. Did you see the Ohio case about a judge that ordered a hospital to treat with Ivermectin? The pushback must rise from the public - you get the healthcare you demand.
Not when it is paid for by Pharmaceutical companies. Medical professionals with integrity & a real understanding of science are walking away from their jobs. In Oregon the NG was called up to work positions in hospitals. More need to walk away.