Mate, if you go look at the ONS stats for the UK. 1.5% or thereabouts of aggregate age grouped populace are currently infected. They spent all of last year saying how the R0 was 3-4-5-6 or whatever, presuming it takes 1 week to spread from host to host then something like 40% of the UK was infected inside 3 weeks sometime last year.
Even if the 1.5% held static week on week we've fucking ran out of people to infect by now, everyone is immune or dead already. Fucking sick of this shit man and the data just sits there right in front of everyone's faces regardless.
I know you're talking about something else but my point is closer to the noses of NPCs and they still can't deduce anything, fucking brainless cunts. Meanwhile they're writing policy guidance on "identifying at risk children who are aged 12-15" etc and there's been according to their own stats, like 2 hospitalisations per 100k and 0 deaths at all.
How can you fucking write about "identifying at risk children" when there's clearly no concept of "at risk children" that exists within the data.
Mate, if you go look at the ONS stats for the UK. 1.5% or thereabouts of aggregate age grouped populace are currently infected. They spent all of last year saying how the R0 was 3-4-5-6 or whatever, presuming it takes 1 week to spread from host to host then something like 40% of the UK was infected inside 3 weeks sometime last year.
Even if the 1.5% held static week on week we've fucking ran out of people to infect by now, everyone is immune or dead already. Fucking sick of this shit man and the data just sits there right in front of everyone's faces regardless.
I know you're talking about something else but my point is closer to the noses of NPCs and they still can't deduce anything, fucking brainless cunts. Meanwhile they're writing policy guidance on "identifying at risk children who are aged 12-15" etc and there's been according to their own stats, like 2 hospitalisations per 100k and 0 deaths at all.
How can you fucking write about "identifying at risk children" when there's clearly no concept of "at risk children" that exists within the data.