Found this to be an interesting read.
https://www.sporcle.com/blog/2019/12/where-did-no-shirt-no-shoes-no-service-come-from/
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
It's a valid question, but in my opinion, the salient takeaway is that it appears to not be a top-down, government-pushed destruction of rights, but rather a way in which independent business owners could protect themselves from encroaching chaos and a crumbling of morality.
These signs are a good thing; a sign (pun not intended, but I'm keeping it!) of civilization and liberty.
you're missing the fact that there is enormous pathway to invent a way to discriminate against people that sidesteps the law.
You're making "drugged-out wrecks" the normal way to address people who don't agree with you or live like you.
I live amongst people who can manage to wear shoes and shirts when they go into most storefront business, and without feeling in the slightest bit oppressed. The only people here who can't manage that are, yes, drugged-out wrecks.
And business owners must be perfectly free to discriminate against vagrants who aren't there to make legitimate purchases, who will repel paying customers, and who need to get clean, not be lavished with "San Francisco compassion."
You're not seeing how "no shoes no shirt no service" is being used to normalize booster shots and masks? Do you think people who don't wear masks and don't want to undergo experimental gene therapy are "drugged out wrecks"?
What about people who take ivermectin? Are they idiots consuming horse dewormer? Or are they citizens dealing with censorship and corruption?
Do you know what site your posting on?
Do you know what drugs you’re on?
I explained it clearly before. There’s no government coercion; there’s no media collusion.
You want to, what, disallow business owners from keeping vagrants from destroying the business, because… Ivermectin? Stop this willfully-stupid troll act, clown.