True, though I'd like to credit him for being quite vocal recently about his anti-mandate stance.
Hoping he's reached his own version of a precipice. But even if he hasn't, at this point I'll take whatever I can get from these public figures with massive platforms.
Every little bit of truth that's exposed is worth a lot IMO
I don't think it's reasonable to expect everyone to immediately change their opinions on drugs, and the value of natural treatments over synthetic ones.
Also, if people choose to take certain drugs for their health or for recreation, that's their right.
But right now, the bigger and more immediate battle is exposing this covid fraud, and opening more eyes to the fact that there are other options when they get a positive result from their fraudulent pcr tests.
Someone wants to inject themselves with a drug made of God-knows what and has a dwindling efficacy rate for a virus with a 99% survivability rate, and still tbd long term side effects and known actual risks, fine have at it! Just don't mandate what I should or shouldn't take.
How about true transparency so patients can make genuinely informed consent?
What we think is informed consent now is really information and advice from doctors who are getting financial perks for pushing meds with a side effect list that's usually triple or quadruple the length of the intended benefits -- side effects that, coincidentally enough, the same drug company has a shiny new pill to treat.
I used to know pharmaceutical sales reps who were in my circle of friends. Their whole job was to schmooze doctors, wine and dine them, give them samples and tell them all the perks of the meds the pharma company was promoting.
True, though I'd like to credit him for being quite vocal recently about his anti-mandate stance.
Hoping he's reached his own version of a precipice. But even if he hasn't, at this point I'll take whatever I can get from these public figures with massive platforms.
Every little bit of truth that's exposed is worth a lot IMO
I don't think it's reasonable to expect everyone to immediately change their opinions on drugs, and the value of natural treatments over synthetic ones.
Also, if people choose to take certain drugs for their health or for recreation, that's their right.
But right now, the bigger and more immediate battle is exposing this covid fraud, and opening more eyes to the fact that there are other options when they get a positive result from their fraudulent pcr tests.
Someone wants to inject themselves with a drug made of God-knows what and has a dwindling efficacy rate for a virus with a 99% survivability rate, and still tbd long term side effects and known actual risks, fine have at it! Just don't mandate what I should or shouldn't take.
How about true transparency so patients can make genuinely informed consent?
What we think is informed consent now is really information and advice from doctors who are getting financial perks for pushing meds with a side effect list that's usually triple or quadruple the length of the intended benefits -- side effects that, coincidentally enough, the same drug company has a shiny new pill to treat.
I used to know pharmaceutical sales reps who were in my circle of friends. Their whole job was to schmooze doctors, wine and dine them, give them samples and tell them all the perks of the meds the pharma company was promoting.
And don't get me started on pharma advertising.