What State are you in? Governor has no authority to make mandate an experimental gene therapy, period. Do not comply. State only that you are religiously exempt. Say nothing more.

First of all, you do know that EAU is experimental and there is informed consent. Despite the misinformation, the FDA did not approve Pfizer's mRNA vaxxine. They only approved a foreign booster shot. This doesn't apply to you or any other unvaxxed individuals.

The EAU law is 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, in which the pertinent part states to wit:

(A) Required condition: (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

You can play the game of "getting informed" by asking questions and many, many more questions. After all you are getting informed. Can your employer put a time limit on this? Legally, I believe this works against them. For them to put a deadline on this is coercion. Keep this in mind because it will be important, especially if they deny you the time you psychologically need to get informed about this drug.

Here is the letter you should start out with and feel free to add or change it to fit your circumstances.

A good tactic is to NOT to outright refuse the jab, but to get informed consent. You have a right to do this, and your boss will be supportive of this. State you are religiously exempt want to get informed consent. Some one wrote the following, but I edited it and personalized it. I think it is a good starting point to work from. One should tweak it and personalize it for your situation:

Inquiry for Fulfilling 'Need to Know' and Informed Consent

Dear Manager:

‘With regard to the company's new policy of mandatory covid injection, it is my desire to exercise the provision therein the Emergency Authorization Act to be fully informed and appraised of ALL of the risks before making my decision.

I’d be most grateful if the following information could be provide to me, in accordance with statutory legal requirements:

1. Can you please advise me of the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently and rigorously tested against control groups and the subsequent outcomes of those tests?

3. Has the vaccine been gone through the required three Phases of Testing?

4. Can you please advise me of the full list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

5. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions and deaths associated with this vaccine since it’s introduction?

6. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT ‘experimental mRNA gene altering therapy’?

7. Because I am in fear of harm resulting from this experimental gene therapy, can you affirm I will suffer no physical or psychological harm?

8. Since the company is mandating the experimental COVID injection for its employees, is the company liable for any adverse reactions, medical conditions, and death as a result of this mandated vaccine policy? 

9. If not, has the company retained a qualified medical physician that has full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.

10. Is the company fully covered by medical insurance in case of such deleterious medical conditions described in 7.

11. Considering the company's Covid-19 vaccination policy against Covid infections, will the company also set policy for its employees to be vaccinated against other infectious diseases such as AIDS, hepatitis, flu, STDs, measles, mumps, pertussis, chicken pox, colds, herpes, and other diseases? 

12. Currently, un-vaccinated employees are identified by the requirement to wear face masks. Will employees having other infectious diseases such as AIDS, hepatitis, flu, STDs, measles, mumps, pertussis, chicken pox, colds, herpes, and other diseases be identified to employees for limiting infections?

13. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my job position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result.

14. Can you please confirm I will not suffer anxiety or any duress in accordance to the Nuremberg Code from any employee before and *post hoc* of my decision?

Keep on asking more questions and force management to answer your questions. If enough people do this at your work, they may back down. At the same time, there is NO LAW mandating vaxxinations in any State of the Union. There is however, for children attending school. However depending on the State, there are religious and/or personal belief exemptions. Only CA, NY, MS, and WV do not allow for religious and personal belief exemptions. Again, this applies to children in school. There is NO LAW mandating vaccines for adults. A company does not have any rights in making law. This role is reserve only for the legislature. A company cannot make policy that is not lawful. If there is no law, it is unlawful to compel its workers to violate their belief.

Know that you are being coerced.

This is about refusing to be coerced into a medical procedure. Furthermore, this is about refusing to be coerced into an EXPERIMENTAL medical procedure.

Liberty of the individual, extends to their right to determine the medical treatment they see as fit for themselves. Trump showed this when he opened the gateway for Americans to opt for experimental medical trials.

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/05/30/trump-signs-right-to-try-legislation-on-experimental-medicines.html

In no statement, does he attempt to COERCE the American people, into getting this vaccine. If they want it - they can get it. If they don't - so be it.

When an employer threatens repercussion - Coercion.

When a government demands it for a passport - Coercion.

When it becomes mandatory - Coercion.

"Permissible Medical Experiments"

The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Trump gave us the vaccine, yes. Only Tyrants have tried to make it mandatory.

How many points of the Nuremburg Code are being violated?