General Flynn: Stop complaining and step up!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (117)
sorted by:
If there were thralls under mind control from a giant fetus that lives inside the sun who are working to turn the entire planet secretly gay, do you think these thralls would leak that information to the public?
Do you think they'd announce their status?
And so forth?
Again, I understand what you believe. But your evidence of your beliefs is that nobody you trust has specifically told you that you're wrong. Q must be real because Trump hasn't said it's not, as if he would feel some obligation to do that.
And when they do tell you that you're wrong, you choose to believe it's optics, misinformation, and that they're screwing with the Deep State, not with you.
Under those conditions, there is literally no theory that could seem impossible to you. None. Including my sun-fetus-alien-overlord theory.
Non-falsifiable theories require faith, not logic. If it's literally impossible for me to even hypothetically find a way to disprove you, then you've built a belief that can neither be proven nor disproven, and that's closer to religion than to anything we can analyze logically or scientifically.
I don't downvote people.
And what exactly do you want me to say?
"All the people with credentials to know about the Plan telling you that there is no Plan could definitely be optics. The fact that the only strong assertion that a Plan is in motion comes from a faceless internet presence whose credentials are impossible to verify is possibly part of the Plan."
I can say it's possible. But it's impossible to prove or disprove under the conditions which you prefer.
Which makes it non-falsifiable.
Here's a better question: exactly WHO at this point could tell you that the Plan doesn't exist that you would take as indication that the Plan doesn't exist? How is your position falsifiable?
Not Flynn. That would be misinformation.
Not Trump. That would just be optics.
Not the military leadership. They're just compromised.
Not people like Pompeo or other officials. They wouldn't admit to a secret Plan.
Not even Q, because you'd almost certainly assume the account was compromised after being inactive for so long.
A good assertion is ALWAYS falsifiable. That means you know, and can tell me, how to beat the argument. You know what sort of evidence would defeat your position, and you have no problem sharing it. You'd WANT people to try to find that evidence to disprove your position, and you could even tell them how.
Because you'd be more interested in the truth than in being right.
I can tell you that my belief that Q is an internet troll nobody would be beaten with concrete proof that he's a military or government operative. That would lend credibility to his claims that Q currently doesn't have. My claim and position on Q is falsifiable. I am telling you how to beat my argument.
So what makes your claim falsifiable? Under what hypothetical condition could someone tell you that this secret Plan doesn't exist and you'd accept that as the truth, and not just disinformation because everything is so completely secret?
I have not really been around PDW since they changed their name to PDW from TDW. Which, if I recall correctly, was around Jan 6th, and around the time it became harder to be a Q supporter around there.
Q supporter? You're not even a Q supporter. You're a libtard who laughs at everyone on this site for thinking Trump is one of the good guys or that Q is a real thing. You're literally a moderator for the Qult subreddit. Gtfo lol