I didn’t lie. I just can’t always predict the direction people want to take conversations, and can’t be held responsible for failing to predict what you’d rather talk about than the concept of logical falsifiability.

I’m here because I’m interested in how we look at the same issue and come to such wildly different conclusions. I don’t lie to you guys. I’m not an infiltrator. I am the most sympathetic normie that I know when it comes to Q stuff. I’ve been with this community longer than many current believers.

And yes, I’ve read devolution. Clearly, it didn’t resonate with me. I am happy to talk about it in another thread at a time when it’s relevant to the conversation we were already having and not an escape route from a conversation you are no longer interested in.

It’s fine. Not a big deal whatsoever.