Hello frens, I need data on when FDA contradicted itself, was factually and provably wrong, or flip flopped on medical information. Specifically I need examples. My medical provider asked me to pull up this specific data, not actually medical data, on this to provide in a medical exemption
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
The lies the CDC tell are going to be very difficult to unwind. I also have a very limited scope—I’ve researched and read most about SV40/polio and other childhood vaccines so that’s the perspective I can give.
First let’s take vaccine problems they admit to: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/concerns-history.html
In the SV40 section they claim SV40 is not linked to cancer, and they link several studies in an attempt to back that up. So they are claiming the studies show this—but not whether the studies were properly conducted, are an accurate sample size, whether they have conflicts of interest etc. that’s where the lie is hidden. They just trusted the science man! How could they know?
The first link goes off the website (maybe all of them do?) and it is titled “Vaccine Safety and your Child: Separating Fact from Fiction”. This is not a cdc resource and is not a government resource. They give a warning that they cannot attest to the accuracy of the information of those websites. So they link you to a website they claim they can’t vouch for.
Click they link, the exit disclaimer will pop up. You’d think the CDC would have their own fact vs fiction info to link to.
The second link is difficult to understand. It’s about the review committee that decided sv40 doesn’t cause cancer. They reviewed mainly published studies and claim they weighted these heavily over unpublished. Despite the fact that funding and publishing was heavily influenced by the government and the NIH, and people who were studying SV40 for the link to cancer had their labs taken away and all funding cut. Like Bernice Eddy. So there is a bias here.
Another this is they assume SV40 is not contagious and will not spread. SV40 has been found in sperm. So when they say that people born after 1964 were not exposed to SV40, they don’t know that. They compare those rates of cancer to the babies and children exposed before 64. Better would have been to compare the cancer rates before the polio vaccine was even introduced. They set up flawed studies and flawed biased committees.
Some of the scientists that were published doing research on SV40 finding no link were sitting on the committee to determine whether they did or not. Biased.
Some scientists used PCR testing as well to isolate SV40 in tumors of humans. Many labs across multiple countries isolated SV40 from human tumors, but the committee blamed “lab contamination” for the “false positives” and backed a published peer reviewed study that found no correlation which was conducted by a scientist on the committee. This is explained in further detail in the book The Virus and the Vaccine.
Take the first “additional resources” link for adventitious agents in viral vaccines. This paper claims Bernice Eddy discovered a mouse virus that caused polyomas and theorized that the monkey kidneys used in polio vaccines could have a similar virus. This is NOT true. Bernice Eddy used SV40 to produce tumors in hamsters. She also worked with another scientist on a different virus that caused cancer in all animals they tested.
So this study got its facts wrong.
You can go on and find flaws. One link was a meta study which concluded that more information was needed but the present data showed no correlation.
One showed that SV40 was not present in 130 different mesothelioma tumor samples: which doesn’t meant that it does not cause cancer. Only that they did not find SV40 there.
So they say something, appeal to some other source, claim they can’t back the accuracy of that other source. Are they lying? Can you prove they did it on purpose?