I want to highlight the fact that though the first part of the book is about covid, there is a substantial amount dedicated to Fauci’s handling of AIDS and some interesting perspectives on HIV not causing AIDS. It just being a cash in opportunity and an “answer” for the “scare” to make the NIAID relevant.
So even if you know about The corona stuff, the AIDS was new to me. I new some patent shenanigans happened and shady things about the discovery of HIV. But I had no idea that there are many who do not believe HIV causes AIDS, and AZT was Faucis solution which he profited from of course, a rebranded chemo treatment that was toxic and failed, and killed those seeking treatment.
Corona is just a repeat of the HIV playbook. Evil man
Some of these assumptions are wrong about the popes role. The pope is not supreme and infallible. His homilies and opinions and things he says about the church and doctrine can all be wrong. But he has the ability to make an infallible statement when other bishops or the laity are confused or divided about doctrine and are pressing for clarity. This type or statement from the pope almost NEVER happens.
The primacy of the pope is not ex halting him above all others either. It is a selected role of leadership and is used to guide the church. All are equal but some things require clarification. In that case issues get passed up from the lowest levels that can handle them (mainly priests at the community level) and all the way up to archbishops and if they can’t solve or clarify along the way in a last case scenario the pope may make a decision. They almost never do. And they are certainly not infallible, even then, unless they are expressly issuing a decree from the seat of Peter.
These things are not explained in the Bible because they grow of tradition. Sola Scriptura is not in the Bible. The Bible wasn’t even compiled until 400 years after Christ. And if God prevented the Bible from containing error, could He not prevent an official papal statement guiding His church to be free from error as well?
Faith alone is in accordance with the Catholic faith if it is true and living faith. “Faith, hope, and charity.” What if you have faith but no love for your brother? “The greatest is charity.” God is love and if you have no love, how can you be known by God? And Faith is a gift from God. But faith without works is dead. Why would we need to work out our salvation with fear and trembling, and be urged by Paul to hold out to the end of the race, if belief in Jesus alone was all it takes? Even Satan believes in Jesus.
The first scripture question I had posed to you in John 6 is in regards to the Eucharist. Jesus said if you don’t eat my flesh and drink my blood, none will have life in you. The word for eat used was like a cow chewing on cud. He doubled down on eating his flesh. The crowds walked away. Even the apostles wanted to leave because they didn’t understand. But they said”where would we go? You have the words of everlasting life”
I am sorry I seem to be changing subject. I am interested in what you say. I have read your article but it seems to be setting up arguments under false pretenses. These are the very arguments I used against Catholics in my conversion.
The serpent gave no instruction. He told her she wouldn’t die if she ate of it and that she would be like God knowing good and evil. And she decided to do it. Satan wants you to choose against God like he did. He wants you to choose the shot for yourself. He wants you to choose the sin. Be diligent.
I am angry with the church leadership. I am frustrated with everything done this whole pandemic. They shut down our church for Easter. They force masks of kids at the Catholic school (hellhole dem state) And I pray God’s Will be done. And that those who die from this die in Gods Grace
Woe to you who call good evil, and evil good. From Isaiah.
And beware the wolf in sheep’s clothing. Matthew 7. We will know them by their fruit.
Like read John 6:47 to the end. What does that mean?
2 Tim 3:16?
The Protestant treatment of Mary was off putting as was the acceptance of birth control. Some Protestant churches allow openly gay pastors, women pastors.. these things I could never understand.
The same behavior exists in the Catholic Church. Sinfulness, corruption. The devil wants to destroy any vector of Truth. But the doctrine of the Catholic Church. It stands. Where is there disagreement? Not on opinion of the pope, but in the true teaching of the Church? What doctrine has the Protestant when there is no agreement? No structure? It troubled me then and troubles me still.
Do you know he was aware of anti-life properties of the shot? If he was deceived and obediently following based on massive widespread deception, believing himself to be better protecting society, listening to those God placed in authority over himself. Where is the fault? Perhaps a lack of prudence?
Obedience is foolish to look at. But it’s a state of the heart. It’s for live of God. It’s devotion. It’s saying “God you put these creatures into authority over me. You hold all the power of appointing all rulers of nations. If they instruct me, so long as it does not violate your commands. I will do it”.
We always have free will. But we never have only cut and dry rules. God has clearly shown we must do things for love of Him. Not just do the command like not kill someone. You’re supposed to love your neighbor. Not even get angry at him in your heart. This is the perfection God calls us to which we fall short of.
The Pharisees did all the rules. But they didn’t do it for love of God.
Obedience is a virtue. It is easy to balk at stupid rules. It’s hard to obey nonsense bullshit for the “good of society” But some do it for love of God as an act of devotion. It’s one of the most difficult for me to understand personally, but it’s worth considering
Their vow is to God. Jesus said to render to Caesar what is Caesar’s . Pay the coin to the pagan government. Is that leading people away from God? The Pharisees tried to trap Jesus with this mentality. You can pay the coin but give to God what is His. The vow was to God and the submission to a church hierarchy is for love of God. That belongs to Him.
The vow the priest makes is to God. I am Catholic and agree the Church is corrupt. But this priest, if he acted in holy obedience, obeying out of love for God because of his vow to God, that is not a stupid thing. It is holy. I pray that is the case for him.
This priest may just be following instructions given by the diocese. Priests take a vow of obedience and are called to submit to higher authority from their bishops. Some diocese are requiring vaccination for the ordained. Lord, forgive his sins and have mercy on his soul, amen.
They are not stupid. Before you think they are, perhaps try to think they may just have a different goal than you think they have.
Declare staffing shortages, you can import foreign workers, have people come in from other states/countries. Maybe that is the goal? Or to create more deaths or problems for non covid patients? Maybe federal government will pay out more money to these hospitals for the shortages? Maybe they get funding based on percent of shots given to workers? Maybe it’s something I haven’t though of. But these mandates and policies come from the top. Many eyes and minds on these policies, many games to be played, pockets to be filled…They are going to find a way to benefit and it might look stupid but all the better for them. Better a fool than selfish, evil, greedy, irresponsible, immoral.
This is a court case for military tribunal. It’s not applicable to executive orders. The original document for the court ruling has nothing about “emergency” or “section 98” with just a quick ctrlF.
Plus, stop posting screenshots when you can go find the original and verify yourself.
The lies the CDC tell are going to be very difficult to unwind. I also have a very limited scope—I’ve researched and read most about SV40/polio and other childhood vaccines so that’s the perspective I can give.
First let’s take vaccine problems they admit to: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/concerns-history.html
In the SV40 section they claim SV40 is not linked to cancer, and they link several studies in an attempt to back that up. So they are claiming the studies show this—but not whether the studies were properly conducted, are an accurate sample size, whether they have conflicts of interest etc. that’s where the lie is hidden. They just trusted the science man! How could they know?
The first link goes off the website (maybe all of them do?) and it is titled “Vaccine Safety and your Child: Separating Fact from Fiction”. This is not a cdc resource and is not a government resource. They give a warning that they cannot attest to the accuracy of the information of those websites. So they link you to a website they claim they can’t vouch for.
Click they link, the exit disclaimer will pop up. You’d think the CDC would have their own fact vs fiction info to link to.
The second link is difficult to understand. It’s about the review committee that decided sv40 doesn’t cause cancer. They reviewed mainly published studies and claim they weighted these heavily over unpublished. Despite the fact that funding and publishing was heavily influenced by the government and the NIH, and people who were studying SV40 for the link to cancer had their labs taken away and all funding cut. Like Bernice Eddy. So there is a bias here.
Another this is they assume SV40 is not contagious and will not spread. SV40 has been found in sperm. So when they say that people born after 1964 were not exposed to SV40, they don’t know that. They compare those rates of cancer to the babies and children exposed before 64. Better would have been to compare the cancer rates before the polio vaccine was even introduced. They set up flawed studies and flawed biased committees.
Some of the scientists that were published doing research on SV40 finding no link were sitting on the committee to determine whether they did or not. Biased.
Some scientists used PCR testing as well to isolate SV40 in tumors of humans. Many labs across multiple countries isolated SV40 from human tumors, but the committee blamed “lab contamination” for the “false positives” and backed a published peer reviewed study that found no correlation which was conducted by a scientist on the committee. This is explained in further detail in the book The Virus and the Vaccine.
Take the first “additional resources” link for adventitious agents in viral vaccines. This paper claims Bernice Eddy discovered a mouse virus that caused polyomas and theorized that the monkey kidneys used in polio vaccines could have a similar virus. This is NOT true. Bernice Eddy used SV40 to produce tumors in hamsters. She also worked with another scientist on a different virus that caused cancer in all animals they tested.
So this study got its facts wrong.
You can go on and find flaws. One link was a meta study which concluded that more information was needed but the present data showed no correlation.
One showed that SV40 was not present in 130 different mesothelioma tumor samples: which doesn’t meant that it does not cause cancer. Only that they did not find SV40 there.
So they say something, appeal to some other source, claim they can’t back the accuracy of that other source. Are they lying? Can you prove they did it on purpose?
A) most of what he took seems to be coenzymes, vitamins, things the body makes naturally. And some pain killer? And ivermectin. Idk, he’d probably have been fine without it but he’s also wealthier and more connected than your average Joe. If that were my case I’d pull out all the stops too
B) I’m all about taking vitamins and enzymes if you need. Better to get them naturally if possible but some can’t(like no vitamin d from sunshine in northern winter). So everybody should do what they are able. Particularly I like NAC, vit D, and nicotine gum early (to bind to ACE2 receptors).
C) covid is probably not that big of a deal but it’s an operation. Lots of moving parts. Getting sick, probably fine. But all of the laws, orders, the conditioning, fear… and it dragging on and on. It’s warfare. And that’s dangerous.
D) Joe is probably testing positive for Covid as a flipping comm, the drugs listed are just boosting his views and maybe it means something else idk. What he listed is not big pharma stuff.
E) most things your immune system can handle. Just work to stay healthy. Eat locally grown food that’s in season. Eat locally raised grass fed meat from small farms. Go outside for several hours a day, watch the sunrise, get more naked in the sun. Eat as much seafood and shellfish as you can. Oysters, mackerel, salmon, seaweed.
Plus you have to think ‘optimal or not?’ Like I have low iron and low hemoglobin. It causes me to be cold and fatigued. I could just wait for my body to make more hemoglobin and get iron from whatever I eat, or I can make the choice to eat many super rare steaks and cut dairy as it blocks iron absorption and feel better sooner. I prefer the latter. Learn your body, make your choices.
I would also like to add that an online copy of the book is useful as it links to sources. And though I am not sure if this has yet happened, he suggested adding and updating links and content over time. Something to consider.