When a person's 'sign of life' quits.....it's because of one of the following reason:
-
They suffered from natural causes and no longer had the ability to continue surviving in their aged body.
-
Because of some medical reason in which they couldn't overcome.
-
Murder.
There's nothing natural about removing parts of a baby out of a woman and therefore killing it. There's nothing medical about removing parts of a baby out of a woman and therefore killing it. There is, however, something called murder when you end a person/baby's 'sign of life', by removing their body parts and therefore killing it.
It doesn't take intelligence to figure this out. Just morals. We unfortunately lack a massive amount of both nowadays.
Abortion is a distraction. Signal, focus on the signal, how many times has Bannon said that?
You add proteins and a regeant to animal derived stem cells, you can have beating heart cells in a petri dish. It's not "life", it is a science experiment a college student can replicate.
Social piety does not excuse forcing any belief on an entire population. The audacity of man to say "I know God thinks life begins at conception" and "abortion is the same as murdering a 5 year old" is mind boggling.
We are the ONLY species that self polices reproduction. Higher domain mammals with no sin infanticide with no hesitation if there's no viability. The mother itself decides it if the environment and resources are not sufficient and the offspring has no chance at survival.
Am I suggesting post term abortions should be legalized? No. Not at all. There's adoption wait lists a mile long, any near full term or post full term should be adopted. In fact, adoption should be easier for everyone involved. I've seen the process and it's logistical hell for the mother and the people wanting to adopt.
Hard line abortion bans, based on religious precedent and emotional irrationality is forcing a cruel destiny on two animals. Essentially that's what humans are. There is no great pretense to people who have sex on an instinctual level. Sex to humans with no religious code is not constrained in morality and doctrine, and concepts such as "abstinence" and "fornication" don't exist
Have fun with a forever welfare state. It's not affluent babies being aborted. It's the Tessica Browns of the world (and even she has 5 kids..all living off the taxpayer)
:The audacity of man to say "I know God thinks life begins at conception" and "abortion is the same as murdering a 5 year old" is mind boggling" You're own audacity and assumptions are egocentric and hypocritical. T The point is if you cant just get free abortions anytime you choose to, you would make the choice to use birth control. Consequences work. This birth control would lead to lower STD rates as a positive byproduct. Ever look up STD rates by race? Hint the ones who get the most abortions have by far the most STDs. Moving on, I would rather have 18 years with a terrible parent (i did) than no life. Who are you to choose for the unborn child which would be better? I see your own grandiose idea of self causes you to miss the forest for the trees. And you sound like a damn eugenicist. Im sure you dont have kids.