When a person's 'sign of life' quits.....it's because of one of the following reason:
-
They suffered from natural causes and no longer had the ability to continue surviving in their aged body.
-
Because of some medical reason in which they couldn't overcome.
-
Murder.
There's nothing natural about removing parts of a baby out of a woman and therefore killing it. There's nothing medical about removing parts of a baby out of a woman and therefore killing it. There is, however, something called murder when you end a person/baby's 'sign of life', by removing their body parts and therefore killing it.
It doesn't take intelligence to figure this out. Just morals. We unfortunately lack a massive amount of both nowadays.
:The audacity of man to say "I know God thinks life begins at conception" and "abortion is the same as murdering a 5 year old" is mind boggling" You're own audacity and assumptions are egocentric and hypocritical. T The point is if you cant just get free abortions anytime you choose to, you would make the choice to use birth control. Consequences work. This birth control would lead to lower STD rates as a positive byproduct. Ever look up STD rates by race? Hint the ones who get the most abortions have by far the most STDs. Moving on, I would rather have 18 years with a terrible parent (i did) than no life. Who are you to choose for the unborn child which would be better? I see your own grandiose idea of self causes you to miss the forest for the trees. And you sound like a damn eugenicist. Im sure you dont have kids.