So you think CRISPR tech is phony? Creating new protein strains is just chemical math, it's real and the psychos involved DO NOT have humanity's best interests in mind.
Fair enough. I'm not looking for an argument, just saying the gene splicing and CRISPR is a much bigger topic than just so-called "viruses". Check out Dr. Stefan Lanka, a virologist. He wrote a paper called "The misconception called virus". That's a good place to start.
Germ theory is a hoax. They ASSUMED there was something very minute causing illness that they called a "virus" (which originally meant "noxious or toxic SUBSTANCE), long before they could prove it. Louis Pastuer won the Nobel Prize for Rabies while never demonsrating the existence of a "rabies virus".
As it turns out, they were never able to prove it, but ran with it like they had. Here we are 80 years later. Still no proof viruses exist. There's not a single scientific medical study that demonstrates human-to-human transmission of anything - not viruses, nor bacteria (which are "real" but don't cause dis-ease).
If you want to go deeper you can look up the work of Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andrew Kaufman. They've demonstrated, beyond the shadow of any doubt, that virologists use of the word "Isolation" is anything but. All "isolated viruses" are demonstrably a toxic cocktail of monkey kidney cells, fetal bovin serum a wide array of poisons, otherwise known as antibiotics (against-life) and some random sick person's bodily fluid. They call the decayed monkey cell tissue particles generated by starving them of nutrition (FBS) and then poisoning with antibiotics their "isolated virus". Sound right to you? Yeah, me neither. That's virology in a nutshell. Yet another pure pseudoscience, beginning to end.
Dr. Lanka ran a series of tests this spring, precisely following virology's tried and true method. In one of the tests, he skipped adding the sick person's bodily fluids. Can you guess what he found? Yep, identical results to the series where he added the sick person's fluids. No discernible differences whatsoever. Just lots of particles of the dead monkey kidney cells floating around - which are "strands of RNA/DNA that are not alive" --- which is our official definition of a "virus".
Please research for yourself. Don't believe me. I couldn't believe it at first either. Takes time. This one is quite the red pill high up on the ladder of disbelief.
Bacteria are opportunistic scavengers, much like a rat or a cockroach. They clean up messes, remove unhealthy tissues and help with toxin removal from the body.
In conclusion:
Viruses aren't real
Germ theory is a fraud
Contagion is a myth (Dr. Tom Cowan wrote a book entitled exactly this if you're interested)
And I get it, this is a heckuva red pill, especially in these times. All of the above doctors have lots of videos explaining he ruse that is ConVid-1984 and how they did it.
Thanks! I’m familiar with the theories and actually read some but not a lot of Dr Lanka’s work. Unless this subject is one’s speciality/career or just a fascinating subject of study it gets pretty dry. I’m maxed-out as so many are now because this has been the front line of this war for almost 2 years now. Our recent Ivermectin WIN (the msm/DS has lost their narrative now) puts us at the start of the next phase IMO. What’s NEXT (and how to prepare)?
So you think CRISPR tech is phony? Creating new protein strains is just chemical math, it's real and the psychos involved DO NOT have humanity's best interests in mind.
You've created a strawman. We're talking exclusively about "viruses".
And your opinion says they’re not “real”? It’s really a grey area dialogue; I’ve heard both sides and don’t hold to either. We’re ALL learning.
Fair enough. I'm not looking for an argument, just saying the gene splicing and CRISPR is a much bigger topic than just so-called "viruses". Check out Dr. Stefan Lanka, a virologist. He wrote a paper called "The misconception called virus". That's a good place to start.
Germ theory is a hoax. They ASSUMED there was something very minute causing illness that they called a "virus" (which originally meant "noxious or toxic SUBSTANCE), long before they could prove it. Louis Pastuer won the Nobel Prize for Rabies while never demonsrating the existence of a "rabies virus".
As it turns out, they were never able to prove it, but ran with it like they had. Here we are 80 years later. Still no proof viruses exist. There's not a single scientific medical study that demonstrates human-to-human transmission of anything - not viruses, nor bacteria (which are "real" but don't cause dis-ease).
If you want to go deeper you can look up the work of Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Andrew Kaufman. They've demonstrated, beyond the shadow of any doubt, that virologists use of the word "Isolation" is anything but. All "isolated viruses" are demonstrably a toxic cocktail of monkey kidney cells, fetal bovin serum a wide array of poisons, otherwise known as antibiotics (against-life) and some random sick person's bodily fluid. They call the decayed monkey cell tissue particles generated by starving them of nutrition (FBS) and then poisoning with antibiotics their "isolated virus". Sound right to you? Yeah, me neither. That's virology in a nutshell. Yet another pure pseudoscience, beginning to end.
Dr. Lanka ran a series of tests this spring, precisely following virology's tried and true method. In one of the tests, he skipped adding the sick person's bodily fluids. Can you guess what he found? Yep, identical results to the series where he added the sick person's fluids. No discernible differences whatsoever. Just lots of particles of the dead monkey kidney cells floating around - which are "strands of RNA/DNA that are not alive" --- which is our official definition of a "virus".
Please research for yourself. Don't believe me. I couldn't believe it at first either. Takes time. This one is quite the red pill high up on the ladder of disbelief.
Bacteria are opportunistic scavengers, much like a rat or a cockroach. They clean up messes, remove unhealthy tissues and help with toxin removal from the body.
In conclusion:
And I get it, this is a heckuva red pill, especially in these times. All of the above doctors have lots of videos explaining he ruse that is ConVid-1984 and how they did it.
Good luck!
Thanks! I’m familiar with the theories and actually read some but not a lot of Dr Lanka’s work. Unless this subject is one’s speciality/career or just a fascinating subject of study it gets pretty dry. I’m maxed-out as so many are now because this has been the front line of this war for almost 2 years now. Our recent Ivermectin WIN (the msm/DS has lost their narrative now) puts us at the start of the next phase IMO. What’s NEXT (and how to prepare)?