Planning the demo of a building is a large endeavor. Planning it for the towers had to have been a HUGE endeavor. How many computer models were built and run to find the optimal solution? When are one of the people who held onto a copy of the computer model (for "insurance") going to trot it out in a fit of conscience? Man that would be epic.
I’m always torn on the 9/11 conspiracies. On one hand, I wouldn’t put it past the deep state, but on the other hand, water in the pipes meeting molten aluminum from the aircraft can theoretically cause explosions, and potentially do enough damage to bring down the towers. Then again, random explosions are unlikely to cause a perfect collapse like we saw.
Now, building 7 is a different story all together. With no damage other than “office fires”, there’s nothing that could have brought it down like that.
The question is whether we can conclude that if one was blown up by the government, all of them must have been? It doesn’t make sense that they would only blow up building 7, and we still haven’t gotten to the bottom of the thermal images days later showing massive heat under the rubble (thermite used?)
Hopefully we can get answers after the election fraud is fixed and the scum bags start getting arrested.
Poor logic. Whatever happened to building 7 does not disprove what happened to the twin towers.
The government will drop the three thousand pages into a burning trash can then alert the media that no evidence exists.
Planning the demo of a building is a large endeavor. Planning it for the towers had to have been a HUGE endeavor. How many computer models were built and run to find the optimal solution? When are one of the people who held onto a copy of the computer model (for "insurance") going to trot it out in a fit of conscience? Man that would be epic.
I’m always torn on the 9/11 conspiracies. On one hand, I wouldn’t put it past the deep state, but on the other hand, water in the pipes meeting molten aluminum from the aircraft can theoretically cause explosions, and potentially do enough damage to bring down the towers. Then again, random explosions are unlikely to cause a perfect collapse like we saw.
Now, building 7 is a different story all together. With no damage other than “office fires”, there’s nothing that could have brought it down like that.
The question is whether we can conclude that if one was blown up by the government, all of them must have been? It doesn’t make sense that they would only blow up building 7, and we still haven’t gotten to the bottom of the thermal images days later showing massive heat under the rubble (thermite used?)
Hopefully we can get answers after the election fraud is fixed and the scum bags start getting arrested.