Some observations:
-
I am more hesitant to post content in public spaces because I do not always have energy to do deep research needed to debunk fact-checking responses.
-
I am more cautious about what I post, as I don't enjoy being publicly shown to have made an error (which many readers will assume to have occurred if I don't reply to factcheck type criticisms)
-
As a result, I am slowing down. Sure, some things which would be in the public interest to be publicised are getting past me, but the quality of the posts I am making publicly is going up.
Ditto everything above for face to face conversations.
Basically the "fact-checking" and censorship is making me carefully double-check my conclusions before making any kind of public statement. If others are doing the same, this means that the quality of argument being presented from the side of those who question the mainstream narrative is being consistently improved and strengthened.
I think this explains the recent media debacle around Ivermectin. It is getting increasingly difficult for them to create the illusion of fact-checking, and as a result they are panicking and getting careless. This is making even more people start to pay attention. For example, my sister has started to research Ivermectin following conversation with me. (She is very trusting and has taken the Vax. All her information sources are mainstream). This weekend I was able to show her that almost everything she had read about Ivy in the mainstream is unreliable at best, and deliberately fradulent at worst. As a result I see the early signs of her beginning to question what she is being told.
So my take-away from this is, let us recognise the opportunity in the censorship, and just keep making it harder and harder for them to debunk the increasingly coherent and compelling arguments mounting against the media narrative. I still believe that Ivermectin is the key to unlocking the conspiracy around vaccines, covid, the election, and all the other malfeasance that lead up to what are increasingly looking like pre-meditated crimes.
God knows it isn't easy for any of us to face up to the task ahead of our societies... Many people in my life have been brought up to think that there is nothing that can be done, and so they HAVE to distract themselves from the overwhelm of realising how wide and powerful the net surrounding us all is.
I actually don't even want my sister to be aware of everything I'm aware of. It would seriously stress her out. But she's a very honest person at heart, and I can see it's bothering her that there might be something corrupt going on.
I try to give something concrete that she can do - for example, making sure she sticks up for the rights of those who have made different choices to her - not supporting mandates, segregation etc by voting with her wallet... She already doesn't pay much attention to current affairs, but I think realising how and why the media is owned by powerful interests is something we all need to really get our heads around. She said yesterday that she was realising that perhaps it hadn't been a wise thing to just trust those in authority, and that made me even more angry with those responsible. Because not only has she been decieved, now she is beginning to think that is her fault. I really don't believe individuals can be blamed for trusting those who are supposed to be trustworthy.
I will pray for your mum to find peace and hope in amongst the worry. We do have hope, because truth always wins in the end. God is not mocked.
Thank you. I think that's good advice, in general, to turn the information into something productive rather than just stewing in a vortex. And, yeah, it's grotesque the way they have violated people's trust, circumvented their consent and that's pretty much playbook for that entire cabal: violations of all bodily consent. And really cognitive consent, as well, with as widely and relentlessly the propaganda is spread. It's grotesque. I was wondering earlier today or late last night about the psychological differences between those who submit and those who object, whether it's simply innate character differences or based upon life experiences, if it's just the dumb luck of the right bit of information from the right messenger at the right time…
Well put it this way, despite the fact that I care intensely about people and genuinely want what's best for the people that I dislike and disagree with, I don't think anyone would describe me as "nice". You know there's that class of person that when you think about them, you just think, yep, they're a "nice" person? And then there's that other group who you recognise as being maybe an acquired taste, or a bit bolshy or argumentative? I think I'm that second group, and it makes sense to me that we would evolve to have both types in our societies. The slightly difficult, contrary sorts who are always poking into everything and want to know why and how all the time. And then the possibly more stable, just keep your head down and get on with it types. Both necessary for a stable society, but have very different roles to play.
As to whether we're born that way or whether it's a function of life experience, I reckon it's mostly innate, but whether it gets dampened down or highlighted is a function of life experience.
I agree with you - it's really grotesque. I think the majority of people are just blindly following the rules and doing what they think they're supposed to do and are going to be horrified when they realise what has been going on. It takes a particular sort to ask the really searching questions, and I'm not sure those sorts of people get into positions of administrative influence very often. If they're anything like me, they struggle to handle the frustration, and cop out and leave the tedious and frustrating work of administration to those who don't get so bothered by it all... So I can't then really blame them for not seeing what they weren't ever trying to see in the first place.
I really DON'T think that applies to journalists though. If you're writing content to be consumed by the masses, you have one job, and one job only, and that's to do what you can to reveal the truth. And if you can't do that, you should just shut up :)
Excellent posts here, pede. You reminded me of Galatians 6. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Galatians%206&version=NIV
You're doing a great job of being gentle with your family. Better than I have with mine for sure. Thank you for giving me some points to think on (both in the Word and the world).
As ever, no-one says it better than God :) Thanks for this friend.