1
inutterable 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. The Plan is not magic. It was never intended to be without casualties. That's impossible due to what we're fighting.

Bear this in mind, [they] would have killed the children no matter what. We're unable to stop all the death, but we can wake up as many as possible and prevent what we can in the future.

There will be a tipping point when [they] finally lash out, and we will get to watch as the head of the snake is crushed.

1
inutterable 1 point ago +1 / -0

For all I know, vax deaths are Satanic sacrifices. Luckily, Christ makes it clear that what goes into the body does not defile you, but rather your habits and choices. Mark 7:15 (great chapter, highly suggested for morning reading)

Even if they are, keep in mind this: they would have been killed anyway.

The Plan, as it is, is not preventing all harm today, but preventing the mass genocide in the future that these insane people want. It will take children dying to do that. You're not to blame for that. I'm not to blame for that. Trump's no to blame for that.

Though we're all a little to blame for that, because we all were asleep at the wheel for so long, thinking if we just voted for the "right party" it'd be enough to fix the problems. But as I pointed out in my previous comment, the true blame lays with the people who failed up the chain from us.

8
inutterable 8 points ago +8 / -0

It should have been stopped years ago by the morals of politicians, but it wasn't.

It should have been struck down years ago by the courts, but it wasn't.

It should have been handled by the States demanding the Fed get back in line, but it wasn't.

It should have been reported by the Media so the People would have been aware, but it wasn't.

It should have been voted out by a population that paid attention to their government, but it wasn't.

It should have been protested by masses numbering in the tens of millions, but it wasn't.

Now it's made it to the children.

As each issue that someone else should have dealt with hits your shoulders, let it feed your righteous anger like fuel to a engine, and put forth your efforts to fix what you can, protect what you must, and hold everyone who failed before you to account for their sins. We're all coming along for this.

WWG1WGA

1
inutterable 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the primary reason you allow it to continue is not because it affects the entire organization, but because it proves your neutrality. Silencing only one side is not neutrality. Allowing everything or restricting everything is neutrality.

The Military will be able to truthfully say it has long been their official policy to restrict both right wing and left wing extremism within the ranks.

6
inutterable 6 points ago +6 / -0

A t-shirt that says "Is this almost over ... or is the govt still doing it?" would go over well as both a timeless red pill and a constantly viable seller.

3
inutterable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Something that I've seen get through to people who reject all things Ivermectin is Corticosteroids. Budesonide, like the inhalers you get when you have allergies or a cold. Practically no one rejects breathing a little easier, and it's well documented that they help.

For your eyes, because it's sounding like anything you suggest as a "Covid cure" will get rejected as against their golden calf religion: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33844996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8310374/

There's several types of corticosteroids, and they pretty much all work versus Covid. The body can defeat Covid. You just need to keep it alive while it does.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ratings bonanza.

Deep State is running on fumes. Someone is going to go demand another payout, because the ratings and ad revenue they're missing by not taking Trump on this is massive. They are starving for viewers.

Every release has a reason. This is a DS pocket drainer.

4
inutterable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Excellent insight, and the real answer. Jews had the option to betray their fellow countrymen to save their own lives.

1
inutterable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't put the test in your nose (or anywhere in your body). If a significant number of people are going to be subjected to this, we should find a way to subvert it.

For instance, how does someone who would fail a urine drug test pass one? They introduce a substance that isn't their urine (usually someone else's urine kept at correct temperature). There are measures in place to try and keep the subversion from happening, like temperature tests, time limits, privacy limits, etc.

What are the PCR tests expecting to be there, what would tip off the test reader that you didn't take the test, and what can you introduce to give a Negative?

Collaborate and Conquer.

2
inutterable 2 points ago +2 / -0

"You're over 18, and they hate that."

11
inutterable 11 points ago +11 / -0

When it comes tumbling down and the evil is exposed for all to see, it is our job at the local level to make sure our police, sheriff, and all law enforcement don't cuck out.

In most places, it will be easy. Once they see truth shining bright and know they have the support of the public, they will be empowered to act.

In some places, there will be corruption within their ranks and other hurdles to overcome. Those anons will have to use every available avenue to try for justice. When all avenues fail, go to Trump and the Military.

3
inutterable 3 points ago +3 / -0

My employer has taken a similar approach (with some coaching from respected employees, self included). Essentially the calculations were:

  1. Compliance is too expensive; spend a ton on testing employees

  2. Demoralize or lose unvaxxed employees; cripple workforce

  3. Show vaxxed workforce that all efforts to improve morale were for show, and they do not matter if the passions of men get scary (which is when you need to know who you can rely on); further workforce demoralized

  4. Workforce is now unable to meet quotas; demoralization and company loss

  5. Reputation damage; unable to hire to replace lost workforce (and hiring unvaxxed will exacerbate problem)

  6. Brand damage; taking a stand on this issue will alienate customers regardless of which stance the company takes

  7. Legal challenges from employees later; any employees who take company to litigation could have any number of valid reasons, successful or not

Ultimate Conclusion: Ignore "mandate" as unenforceable and too damaging to comply with. Prepare for litigation if enforcement is attempted. 4th, 9th, 10th, 14th. ADA, EEO, Civil Rights, and other anti discrimination laws.

"We will pay nothing, and we will be happy."

6
inutterable 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not completely true. The jury would only need to be afraid of the backlash.

Similar to how most of the country is unaware that Patriots are in Control.

8
inutterable 8 points ago +8 / -0

Got kicked out of my brother's wedding for refusing the jab and masking. Parents, middle bro, friends, etc all attended. All were pointing the fingers at me, giving me the business, and all the usual.

Stood strong, had a day in the woods, fed people's dogs for them, went hunting.

Afterwards, my parents, my friends, and middle bro have all changed their tune. They think it was stupid that I was kicked out. No one else at the wedding bothered with a mask, and they're sure it's impossible that everyone in attendance was jabbed. Therefore, I was kicked out needlessly and because they happened to know my medical history.

Stand firm. Put your Faith in God, where it belongs. Truth destroys all illegitimate views given enough time.

12
inutterable 12 points ago +12 / -0

[They] want riots from a Not Guilty verdict.

The Jury wants the Judge to declare a mistrial so they're off the hook and won't get strung up by Antifa.

The Judge is protecting Kyle by holding off on the Mistrial, because a Mistrial allows the State to prosecute again and a Mistrial with Prejudice will allow Kyle to be sued civilly later by the One Armed Bandit.

The Prosecutors were trying for the Mistrial because they had no case and are likely taking kickbacks from the attorneys from the civil case.

The best outcome is a Not Guilty verdict. Kyle goes truly clear, the Judge can still disbar the Prosecutors, the civil cases are thrown out for cause, and the National Guard can deal with the riots with Maximum Prejudice.

6
inutterable 6 points ago +6 / -0

The media would need to spin it as "prosecutors intentionally sink Kyle case".

Or we could...

1
inutterable 1 point ago +1 / -0

YOU control if you can be coerced. There are no assurances anywhere except that God is the only one in control.

Keep in communication with your Patriots. Expose anyone who attempts to defile you. Give no quarter.

WWG1WGA

1
inutterable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, the war when all memes were still great. I remember those days.

In those days, it was acceptable to spread a Trump as a normal meme, because the Left's triggering was early and mild. Not like today, where you have to set up counseling services and apology videos if someone says his name too loudly around a lite-brite hair.

My friends, this used to be acceptable in an office environment. Enjoy its glory: https://files.catbox.moe/72bkkc.png

.

I think I have another meme war in me if they're asking for it. For God and Country.

7
inutterable 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not about the phone. It's about removing their excuse for having the data from the phone, making everything else they try to justify doing with said data illegal.

We've given them plenty of rope, now they get to hang themselves.

view more: Next ›