Not only is this audit huge but it must be done so that nothing can be questioned (reasonably) or challenged.
So whatever they release, regardless of what it is, is not going to be unchallenged under any circumstances.
Even if the audit report is 100% bulletproof, the next step after its release is going to be going to court to have each and every single claim examined and dissected in detail. Under oath, with lawyers and data scientists and election legal experts.
This will almost certainly include a new audit, which will be partisan on the side of the Democrats, and/or an audit team that is officially certified to do these types of audits, both examining the original data and Cyber Ninjas' conclusions about that data.
Not a single claim from the Cyber Ninjas is going to be held as actionable unless other audit parties are able to replicate those exact same findings with exactly the same data. If a number can't be reproduced, then it will likely be considered invalid. Happens in the legal system, happens in science, happens in logic.
That's the point of an audit: to demonstrate reproducible methodological flaws. So that means that legally, the next step is going to be auditing the audit and seeing if Cyber Ninjas' claims can be reproduced by other parties. That will probably take a while, and that's assuming that the Cyber Ninjas cooperate fully.
I can't think of anything the Cyber Ninjas could write in that report that would lead to a profound, noticeable change in this country before it ends up in court, but time will tell.
"So whatever they release, regardless of what it is, is not going to be unchallenged under any circumstances."
The problem isn't the audit. The problem is a system so corrupt that Patriots get censored, deplatformed, and threatened with legal action and disparaged by Democrats and Republicans. This whole process could have been over now if everyone was interested in one citizen, one vote as per our Constitution. But we know they don't care about our country or us. They want a NWO with us as techno serfs. That's the conspiracy that's has been exposed. Not a theory, but fact talked about by Trudeau, Macron, Johnson who parrot the WEF and others. They are going down no matter what. Nazi Germany had the rule of law and courts, too. They didn't last long. NCSWIC.
I can't ignore linear time. That takes a falsifiable argument and makes it nonfalsifiable. It takes a testable theory and makes it one I can only accept on faith.
If Q predicts that something is going to happen, then he can either be right, or wrong.
If a Q prediction can happen today, or tomorrow, or next month's anniversary, or next year's anniversary, or at the three year delta, or if instead his prediction is supposed to come true by turning his post number into a date, or if it correlates with a delta from Trump's twitter that mentions another date, or if it mentions a color which when translated into a date becomes a new possible delta...
That's not falsifiable. That's not testable. Those aren't coincidences. That's just you deciding that Q can't fail, and rather, he's using "non-linear time" to make predictions. That's faith.
Faith is fine. But we can't debate faith, we can't analyze faith, we can't scientifically falsify faith.
That's not true whatsoever. I think in linear time because we live in a three-dimensional world, and mathematical chaos theory offers two different paradoxical conclusions: that we are subject to the whims of the direction and momentum of every particle in the universe at any given moment in a mathematically-predictable way, and that we have absolutely no way to predict any of it using real-world methodologies.
Time doesn't get to be whatever you want it to be in order for your theory to make sense. It just looks like cognitive dissonance. When a delta passes uneventfully, you refuse to accept that Q's prediction might have been wrong, and instead find it easier to believe in an entity that can exist in "non-linear time."
I can't work with non-falsifiable entities. I don't debate religion, and a Q that can exist the way you would need him to is borderline godlike.
"Not a single claim from the Cyber Ninjas is going to be held as actionable unless other audit parties are able to replicate those exact same findings with exactly the same data." If other audit parties don't have a technique to detect what the cyber ninjas can do then that won't happen. That would be like trying to measure the with of a sheet of metal with a ruler instead of calipers. It won't work.
"So that means that legally, the next step is going to be auditing the audit..." Try that with the IRS.
"Not a single claim from the Cyber Ninjas is going to be held as actionable unless other audit parties are able to replicate those exact same findings with exactly the same data." Wrong. ASTM, for example, uses reproducibility and repeatabilty as standards to be met. Science, right?
No claim by Cyber Ninjas that is made with some sort of hidden, unexaminable technique is going to be considered legally valid. Again, it HAS to be reproducible.
I can't claim to have a machine that converts lead into gold, present you a lump of gold as my "evidence", and then claim that no, you can't examine the inside of my machine, because it's secret. You just have to accept that I can turn lead into gold. You aren't allowed to try it yourself using MY technology.
You'd call bullshit. Rightfully. Maybe I'm not lying, but I am not going to get published or taken seriously by anyone.
Cyber Ninjas will, as a matter of legal process, have to reveal how they came to their conclusions. If they don't, the case will die as a whisper in the wind.
Hello? You can't understand the analogy I presented? You leap to lead into gold? Reductio ad Absurdum doesn't work here. Of course they're going to reveal the process. That's the fun part.
If they reveal the process, somebody is going to attempt to reproduce it. And I don't think that the kinds of lawyers and auditors that would be available to the Democrats would lack the fine motor coordination to reproduce the methodologies used by Cyber Ninjas.
I suppose that's the part I don't get. You think Cyber Ninjas is running an operation and mechanism so sophisticated that nobody else COULD replicate their method, even if walked through it step-by-step?
So whatever they release, regardless of what it is, is not going to be unchallenged under any circumstances.
Even if the audit report is 100% bulletproof, the next step after its release is going to be going to court to have each and every single claim examined and dissected in detail. Under oath, with lawyers and data scientists and election legal experts.
This will almost certainly include a new audit, which will be partisan on the side of the Democrats, and/or an audit team that is officially certified to do these types of audits, both examining the original data and Cyber Ninjas' conclusions about that data.
Not a single claim from the Cyber Ninjas is going to be held as actionable unless other audit parties are able to replicate those exact same findings with exactly the same data. If a number can't be reproduced, then it will likely be considered invalid. Happens in the legal system, happens in science, happens in logic.
That's the point of an audit: to demonstrate reproducible methodological flaws. So that means that legally, the next step is going to be auditing the audit and seeing if Cyber Ninjas' claims can be reproduced by other parties. That will probably take a while, and that's assuming that the Cyber Ninjas cooperate fully.
I can't think of anything the Cyber Ninjas could write in that report that would lead to a profound, noticeable change in this country before it ends up in court, but time will tell.
"So whatever they release, regardless of what it is, is not going to be unchallenged under any circumstances."
The problem isn't the audit. The problem is a system so corrupt that Patriots get censored, deplatformed, and threatened with legal action and disparaged by Democrats and Republicans. This whole process could have been over now if everyone was interested in one citizen, one vote as per our Constitution. But we know they don't care about our country or us. They want a NWO with us as techno serfs. That's the conspiracy that's has been exposed. Not a theory, but fact talked about by Trudeau, Macron, Johnson who parrot the WEF and others. They are going down no matter what. Nazi Germany had the rule of law and courts, too. They didn't last long. NCSWIC.
What does NCSWIS mean? Is that a typo, or did I miss an addition to the Q codebook?
dont be obtuse dude.
anyone who spends time on this forum knows exactly what he meant to write...
Thanks for noticing.
I can't ignore linear time. That takes a falsifiable argument and makes it nonfalsifiable. It takes a testable theory and makes it one I can only accept on faith.
If Q predicts that something is going to happen, then he can either be right, or wrong.
If a Q prediction can happen today, or tomorrow, or next month's anniversary, or next year's anniversary, or at the three year delta, or if instead his prediction is supposed to come true by turning his post number into a date, or if it correlates with a delta from Trump's twitter that mentions another date, or if it mentions a color which when translated into a date becomes a new possible delta...
That's not falsifiable. That's not testable. Those aren't coincidences. That's just you deciding that Q can't fail, and rather, he's using "non-linear time" to make predictions. That's faith.
Faith is fine. But we can't debate faith, we can't analyze faith, we can't scientifically falsify faith.
That's not true whatsoever. I think in linear time because we live in a three-dimensional world, and mathematical chaos theory offers two different paradoxical conclusions: that we are subject to the whims of the direction and momentum of every particle in the universe at any given moment in a mathematically-predictable way, and that we have absolutely no way to predict any of it using real-world methodologies.
Time doesn't get to be whatever you want it to be in order for your theory to make sense. It just looks like cognitive dissonance. When a delta passes uneventfully, you refuse to accept that Q's prediction might have been wrong, and instead find it easier to believe in an entity that can exist in "non-linear time."
I can't work with non-falsifiable entities. I don't debate religion, and a Q that can exist the way you would need him to is borderline godlike.
"Not a single claim from the Cyber Ninjas is going to be held as actionable unless other audit parties are able to replicate those exact same findings with exactly the same data." If other audit parties don't have a technique to detect what the cyber ninjas can do then that won't happen. That would be like trying to measure the with of a sheet of metal with a ruler instead of calipers. It won't work.
"So that means that legally, the next step is going to be auditing the audit..." Try that with the IRS.
"Not a single claim from the Cyber Ninjas is going to be held as actionable unless other audit parties are able to replicate those exact same findings with exactly the same data." Wrong. ASTM, for example, uses reproducibility and repeatabilty as standards to be met. Science, right?
No claim by Cyber Ninjas that is made with some sort of hidden, unexaminable technique is going to be considered legally valid. Again, it HAS to be reproducible.
I can't claim to have a machine that converts lead into gold, present you a lump of gold as my "evidence", and then claim that no, you can't examine the inside of my machine, because it's secret. You just have to accept that I can turn lead into gold. You aren't allowed to try it yourself using MY technology.
You'd call bullshit. Rightfully. Maybe I'm not lying, but I am not going to get published or taken seriously by anyone.
Cyber Ninjas will, as a matter of legal process, have to reveal how they came to their conclusions. If they don't, the case will die as a whisper in the wind.
Hello? You can't understand the analogy I presented? You leap to lead into gold? Reductio ad Absurdum doesn't work here. Of course they're going to reveal the process. That's the fun part.
I guess I did not understand.
If they reveal the process, somebody is going to attempt to reproduce it. And I don't think that the kinds of lawyers and auditors that would be available to the Democrats would lack the fine motor coordination to reproduce the methodologies used by Cyber Ninjas.
I suppose that's the part I don't get. You think Cyber Ninjas is running an operation and mechanism so sophisticated that nobody else COULD replicate their method, even if walked through it step-by-step?