That's a bit like calling Shakespeare a writer of fiction. Dostoyevski is considered a purveyor of great ideas because his was one of the heat minds in Western civilization.
Being attributed to anyone who did not make the statement is destructive of credibility (and rightly so, because one would be attempting to deceive). If you believe it, say so and quote yourself. Attributing it to "anonymous" is pathetic.
The statement is the relevant part -- whether is is attributed to a writer of fiction or not doesn't seem too important to me.
It goes to the issue of credibility. Once that goes out the window, you have nothing to stand on. You are good with dishonesty?
It would be better if it said 'Anonymous', but being attributed to a writer of fiction doesn't really add any credibility.
That's a bit like calling Shakespeare a writer of fiction. Dostoyevski is considered a purveyor of great ideas because his was one of the heat minds in Western civilization.
Great not heat. Auto check strikes again.
Being attributed to anyone who did not make the statement is destructive of credibility (and rightly so, because one would be attempting to deceive). If you believe it, say so and quote yourself. Attributing it to "anonymous" is pathetic.