If this is more than just anecdotal, the fallout over these jabs could soon reach heartbreaking new levels. For context, this guy is a professor of psychiatry & director of medical ethics at UC Irvine - The Great Awakening

If this is more than just anecdotal, the fallout over these jabs could soon reach heartbreaking new levels. For context, this guy is a professor of psychiatry & director of medical ethics at UC Irvine (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by wQkeAF 3 years ago by wQkeAF +326 / -0

79 comments download

79 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (79)

sorted by:

▲ 25 ▼

– deleted 25 points 3 years ago +27 / -2

▲ 4 ▼

– Wtf_socialismreally 4 points 3 years ago +9 / -5

This stupid notion, this inane reasoning that "the ending won't be for everyone" means that innocent people will die is so idiotic.

It is intensely mutually exclusive with "your families are safe", but fucking retards seem to overlook that.

Innocent lives aren't pawns for either side to use, and the apathy towards every day people being vaccinated when they struggle to make ends meet or are misled by billions of dollars of propaganda and every trusted authority figure on the planet standing in lockstep with each other (or else) is so ridiculous that it makes me apathetic towards our own side.

This line being used to reason away the deaths and maiming of anyone makes our side no better than the leftists, and further reinforces my hatred of all people because all of you seem to be the same.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q