If fertility issues existed , it would be well known. I have used ivermectin on my animals for decades. Yet I’m am the idiot for believing ivermectin does not harm fertility. I should just bow down the vax god.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
What we need to understand about “studies” is that the conclusion is decided before the study even begins.
I call it “the Downing Street Memo”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_memo
The “facts” are fixed around the agenda.
With vaccine studies, they begin with the wild assumption that the vaccine is perfectly safe, and then they don’t try very hard to disprove their own wild assumption.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis
Then they unilaterally, arbitrarily decide what the threshold for “statistical significance” is, based on nothing but the authors own personal opinions, and for some reason this becomes “settled science”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_significance
And if their study accidentally discovers something “statistically significant” they simply omit those data from the study, and publish a conclusion that is the exact opposite of what their own data showed them
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html