Liz Harris made an intentional mistake for the COVER of her vote canvas. ALL eyes are now on the AZ Audit. The “REAL” Audit will prove the past.
(mobile.twitter.com)
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (142)
sorted by:
Think about it. A lot that wasn’t empty, is claimed as empty, on the very front page of the Canvas report.
They’ve stirred the hornets nest. Everyone is out to “debunk.” That house, however, is the only thing in the report that will be debunked. And it’s on the front page.
It’s a trap to get the attention of the whole country, and it’s working beautifully.
Do we have signs it’s working? I hope so. I’m tired of our team looking retarded. I suppose it’s like the Four Season Crematorium photo. ( IIRC they intentionally F-Ed up to show they knew that place where people were burning the ballots right? Or did I hallucinate that out of my imagination? )
Literally the proof is in the OP link! Look at that loony lefty who has been anti-audit psycho since the start sharing it with all of his followers! And, that twitter dude has been quoted by mainstream media multiple times. Imagine if twitter crazy dude would have said: 'Shit, CNN, this report is perfect and shows our fraud!' Do you think CNN would blast that report all over their prime time news hour? You guys gotta think man. This is a silent information war. Trump played the media the EXACT same way.
No it just discredits everything. Thats not a win
this right here.
No, boo on both of you. Think past schoolground images and discrediting based off of mistakes and not content - that's what the left does. 'Oooh, this far right extremist misspelled floogenheimer, that means his theory of 1+1=2 is false NEENER NEENER'. Moves and counter-moves man cmon fren's 40k foot view per Q.
We're trying to wake people up. We're trying to get them to look at and trust our sources. If it's full of spelling mistakes or statistical errors it discredits everything and sabotages the awakening project.
If it makes you look amateur you will not be taken seriously. It's like self publishing on amazon. If your book cover has errors, why would i trust the inside content to be accurate or serious?
The subtle nudge to get eyes on that [THEY] don't want on it, lest the narrative is utterly destroyed. I'm impressed with how they did it.