Conspiracy theory thought!
🔍 What does this mean?
How many people think that the reason the deep state and the cabal are so against Ivermectin, is because if lizard people are exposed to ivermectin, they would die! Maybe they are truly walking parasites, for reals - and exposure to ivermectin, would kill them? Just a crazy conspiracy theory thought I guess!
It was a thought I had, and I shared it. It’s up to you to dissect the hell out of it or not. It doesn’t matter to me. The fact that I shared it states that I am a free thinker, but apparently you’re not. You’re not gonna put your psycho mumbo-jumbo babble on me. I’ve Had quite a few narcissistic sociopaths in my life, I’ve been very well trained. And I see right through yours
One doesn't "had a thought"; one had a thought about aka in reaction to either perceived inspiration or suggested information. Your use of "deep state; cabal; ivermectin; lizard people; conspiracy" implies reaction to suggestion form others; because nature offered your sense of perception neither of these.
Free will of choice indeed and I use it upon whatever inspires me.
We coexist as matter (form) within flow, so however each of us reacts to anything affects all of us; hence the ever changing circumstances we need to adapt to.
If you share for the sake of sharing; you perpetuate suggestion towards the free will of others, which represents the temptation of ignorance for them. Resist writing for others, to instead use writing for the sustenance of self, which reduces the temptation upon others when shared.
Free implies free-dom aka "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance. Choice represents reaction to balance, so even if we use our choice to ignore this, we still have the free will of choice. Not implies nothing aka the consented to suggestion to believe in nothingness; which implies choice to ignore everything.
You choose to perceive it as suggested information; while judging it through the lens of reason (conflict between true and false). How about instead of reason you try to use implication (if/then); while also questioning if nature offers your perception "false" information?
If nature doesn't offer false information; then how about instead of consenting to reason about true vs false information; you simply adapt to whatever inspires you, while using implication in adherence to natural law?
If narcissism represents idolization of self; then why narciss-ism aka a suggested belief system by others?
As for sociopath (anti-social)...SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.]
So narcissistic sociopath translates to self-love (narcissistic) and anti-self-love (sociopath) aka a contradiction in terms.
That implies "been trained by" aka educated through suggestion aka domestication of free will to free will of others.
What's my intent?
I’m not here to argue with people. I am on here to share my own opinions. Have a great day
u/#Demolitionman