Conspiracy theory thought!
🔍 What does this mean?
How many people think that the reason the deep state and the cabal are so against Ivermectin, is because if lizard people are exposed to ivermectin, they would die! Maybe they are truly walking parasites, for reals - and exposure to ivermectin, would kill them? Just a crazy conspiracy theory thought I guess!
Ivermectin ends the vax agenda. Vax cannot exist with treatments. Pretty sure it treats a lot more too. More on that to come I'm sure.
It's simple for me. If the cabal narrative says it's bad, they actually mean it's bad for them, which I take as good for us. Luciferians invert.
Exactly. Satan is the father of all lies. So we have to remember that every word comes out of their mouth are lies. If we just do the opposite of everything they say, we should be good!
Interesting theory.
Or maybe parasites are an infernal creation to shorten human life spans, so we don't live to be 900+ years old like in the Bible. 😵
Seriously… Every other mammal that is kept by human beings has a parasite cleansing regimen. Cats, dogs, sheep, goats, horses, etc. etc. etc. why don’t people do it?
Actually if you try to talk to your doctor about parasites, they’ll make you think like you’re crazy or something. And that they don’t exist. It’s the stupidest thing ever. There are parasites, mammals get them, including humans, I just say otherwise this madness.
But yeah you’re right can you imagine if we all did a parasite cleanse twice a year, how much more healthy people would be, and how big Pharma wouldn’t have the thumbs on us all!
Far fetched yes haha. No, Ivermectin ends their narrative and their pharmaceutical money train. So they need to wipe it out before it cures people that have to take handfuls of random pills daily.
Exactly… The ivermectin years a lot of things I’m sure of it. Along with hydroxychloroquine, the pharmaceutical companies can go out of Business. Well better yet, they wouldn’t have all those slush fund, and funds to throw at or politicians to get what they want, to push a Narrative
Thanks. Just one of those getting ready to go to sleep thought
Yep! Do you know what… on a sidenote… I’m in Hawaii right now for a couple months with my family, they have a house here. Anyway they have a huge piece of property.
At night I go out to put water in these bowls or dishes on the side of the house, because the frogs come out. Big huge frogs. Like a lot of frogs 5, 6, 7, 8 I guess.
I took a picture together and I didn’t want of the frogs and he had these laser eyes because of the reflection of the flash, I called him the frog of War! I posted the picture here it was so funny!
Anyway… Lizards, frogs, whatever!
PEPE!
If you consider the theory that the "reptilians" are actually tiny parasites that can enter your blood stream and control your brain, then you are spot on.
Yeah I forgot about that. Doesn’t the vaccine break the blood barrier between the body and the brain. That makes more sense then.
Heard about lizard people conspiracy theories for like 15 years but never took that shit seriously.
Reached the point of this actually being plausible only this week after watching Donald Marshall - Human Cloning Centres.
that's some dank shit xD
Yeah I know I have heard of it too but I really couldn’t put a finger on it but I’ll watch this video to see what it’s about
You're not the first, have a read through this parasite conspiracy it's spicy af xD
https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf
I don’t need to waste my time because I know it’s not a conspiracy.
That makes perfect sense. Population control or deer population control
Reason represents the conflict between believers and non-believers about true versus false suggestions, and all suggestions are made by the free will of choice from others. Choice is defined as the reaction to balance; and consenting by chocie to suggestion by other choice represents a) ignorance of reacting as choice to balance and b) submission of choice to choice aka free will to free will.
If you think through the lens of reason (conflict) you already consented to ignore reality (coexistence aka no conflict) for suggested fiction (-isms); which is what you're reasoning about.
Does nature offered you "deep state; cabal; ivermectin; lizard people; conspiracy" or did you consent to believe/not believe the suggestions of others; while now perpetuating them to others; while causing endless more conflicts of reason?
It was a thought I had, and I shared it. It’s up to you to dissect the hell out of it or not. It doesn’t matter to me. The fact that I shared it states that I am a free thinker, but apparently you’re not. You’re not gonna put your psycho mumbo-jumbo babble on me. I’ve Had quite a few narcissistic sociopaths in my life, I’ve been very well trained. And I see right through yours
One doesn't "had a thought"; one had a thought about aka in reaction to either perceived inspiration or suggested information. Your use of "deep state; cabal; ivermectin; lizard people; conspiracy" implies reaction to suggestion form others; because nature offered your sense of perception neither of these.
Free will of choice indeed and I use it upon whatever inspires me.
We coexist as matter (form) within flow, so however each of us reacts to anything affects all of us; hence the ever changing circumstances we need to adapt to.
If you share for the sake of sharing; you perpetuate suggestion towards the free will of others, which represents the temptation of ignorance for them. Resist writing for others, to instead use writing for the sustenance of self, which reduces the temptation upon others when shared.
Free implies free-dom aka "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance. Choice represents reaction to balance, so even if we use our choice to ignore this, we still have the free will of choice. Not implies nothing aka the consented to suggestion to believe in nothingness; which implies choice to ignore everything.
You choose to perceive it as suggested information; while judging it through the lens of reason (conflict between true and false). How about instead of reason you try to use implication (if/then); while also questioning if nature offers your perception "false" information?
If nature doesn't offer false information; then how about instead of consenting to reason about true vs false information; you simply adapt to whatever inspires you, while using implication in adherence to natural law?
If narcissism represents idolization of self; then why narciss-ism aka a suggested belief system by others?
As for sociopath (anti-social)...SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.]
So narcissistic sociopath translates to self-love (narcissistic) and anti-self-love (sociopath) aka a contradiction in terms.
That implies "been trained by" aka educated through suggestion aka domestication of free will to free will of others.
What's my intent?
I’m not here to argue with people. I am on here to share my own opinions. Have a great day
u/#Demolitionman