I think most of us suspect stuff like the vaccinated vs unvaccinated numbers are rigged, but why trust any of the data they're giving us at all, even the very simple cases and deaths?
Every bit of covid data is filtered through hospitals which have to be full cult environments by now, the CDC and then MSM outlets.
People like Scott Adams say the news is fake but then point to data that the vaccinations prevent hospitalizations... why is the news fake but the numbers real?
One of the ways they can mess with our minds is to cause confusion. Nothing confuses like someone being illogical. Having no sound premises for any arguments and not using logic to expound your position can create enormous confusion.
Remember:
A "case" used to be someone with symptoms but, since COVID-19, it is now someone who failed a test - no symptoms required.
OK, how reliable is that test? Well, it isn't. Even its inventor told us so and its outcome can be affected by labs choosing different cycle numbers so any results are subject to manipulation.
It could be that if we had a reliable COVID-19 test and we tested only symptomatic people then we would never have had the numbers for a pandemic in the first place!
Then the WHO/CDC change the number of cycles permitted and which people should be tested and you cannot even make comparisons. We have the VAERS database but no-one can say for sure what percentage of cases that reflects. Comparisons across countries (states or even labs) are not valid for all kinds of reasons.
Then we get the arguments that go round in circles, as in: Jabs are good so you must have one. OK, so if you are jabbed then I do not need one. No, jabs are not good and you could give me COVID-19. So why did you bother getting jabbed? Go to start and repeat.
It is quite difficult to present a foolproof argument about many things COVID-19-related because there is no firm base and all the time our governments are taking away our rights on a daily basis.