STUDY: Ivermectin is a safe and effective remedy for covid that costs less than $1 a day
New research out of Israel has found that administering the anti-parasite drug ivermectin to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) patients may help to drastically reduce the duration of infections – and all for less than $1 a day.
Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, launched a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial last May that evaluated the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among non-hospitalized Chinese Virus patients with mild to moderate infection.
That trial recently wrapped up, showing that the drug, which was first approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) back in 1987, can help to minimize the impact of the Fauci Flu both safely and effectively.
The discoverers of ivermectin, by the way, were awarded a Nobel Prize in 2015 for successfully using ivermectin to treat onchocerciasis, a disease caused by infection with a parasitic roundworm.
Over the years, it has further been revealed that ivermectin is an effective remedy against scabies and head lice, as well as a variety of viruses ranging from HIV to common influenza to Zika to West Nile.
Since a five-day course of ivermectin costs around 60 cents in the third world, and about $10 in Israel, it is a highly economical remedy that could easily put an end to the plandemic and get everyone and everything back to the old normal. Because it works so well and costs next to nothing, however, the FDA and the World Health Organization (WHO) are saying no way, José!
Since ivermectin appears to work effectively, the government doesn’t want you to have access to it
In Schwartz’s study, 89 volunteers over the age of 18 who tested “positive” for Chinese Germs were divided into two groups: one that received ivermectin and the other that received a placebo. All participants took their pills for three days in a row one hour before every meal.
Every two days and at the end of the sixth day, each volunteer was administered a standard nasopharyngeal swab PCR test, which supposedly identifies viral loads of the Fauci Flu. (NOTE: This is highly disputed now that it has been revealed ( https://t.me/naomirwolf/154 ) that PCR tests were never designed to look for the Chinese Virus, but rather for seasonal influenza.)
Even so, what this process found is that about 72 percent of all volunteers who received ivermectin tested negative for the Chinese Virus by day six. In contrast, only 50 percent of those who received the placebo tested negative.
As for the culture viability of each patient, meaning how infectious they were by the end of the regimen, a mere 13 percent of the ivermectin group was still infectious after six days compared to 50 percent in the placebo group.
“Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity,” Schwartz said.
“It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact.”
Schwartz’s study has been published on the health research sharing site MedRxiv, where it has not yet been reviewed by peers. Another study that came to similar conclusions, however, has been peer-reviewed and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
Despite claims by the establishment to the contrary, ivermectin did not show any significant side effects in Schwartz’s trial, suggesting that it is not only inexpensive but also safe and effective.
Yeah - kind of amazing that it was discovered really!
And now THEY think they can mock people into NOT taking a known coronavirus cure. Well - maybe they can convince a few liberals, but patriots are completely unaffected by their "horse paste" jokes.
Nice . Thank you. Perfect timing - will send this to my asshole FORMER doctor that is injecting his pregnant patients and making fun of the horse de-wormer. Neigh!
Thanks. Just watched this video showing the different results between Ivermectin and Remdesivir for use against Covid and it's pretty upsetting. The Chief Medical Officer of the medical group that I've been going to for the last 30 years has been publishing a newsletter every 2-4 weeks during the plandemic. In the last newsletter I received it stated that while Ivermectin showed some promise in the beginning, it seemed to lose it's effectiveness and now they've been giving patients Remdesivir. I need to find this guy's email and send him a link to this video.
I went to an Urgi-Care center yesterday after cutting a finger. While getting treated I spoke to the doctor who was in charge of this and 11 other clinics run my a large urban medical center. I asked specifically about Ivermectin and what he thought of it. He said it was useless. All the studies show it has no benefit. Really? I said. I mentioned a big study in Brazil and the data coming from India showing dramatic results. He just say, aha like in one ear and out the other. So I asked what exactly is the latest protocol for newly diagnosed Covid patients. He said monoclonal antibody therapy. He said all the patients he knows that used it have very good results and were better within a week.
Now here's a good example of a well intentioned doctor who read a couple of cherry picked studies from JAMA or NEJM and that was all he needed to think it didn't work. I know he never heard of the amazing results being reported globally that has been ignored by the major journals who are funded in large part by big pharma. The hospital would rather give you $3000 treatments than ones costing $20. I'm happy they have it to give people but it begs the question, why not use HCQ or Ivermectin as a preventative or early when symptoms first arise? Because their most trusted "highly respected" journals say it doesn't work. End of story.
By the time the truth is acknowledged, if ever, Pfizer and Moderna will be hundreds of $Billions richer, insurance rates will again go through the roof and we'll be on to the next pandemic. These doctors trust in the accuracy of these Journals so completely that it never occurs to them they are seeing anything but the absolute truth. So when it comes to re-imagining our health care systems, a top priority item needs to be a full investigation into the editorial and review boards of these Journals and that should include a review of their personal finances to see if there were any significant payments that can be tied back to big pharma. Then there should be investigations into those who develop and decide the protocols each hospital and clinic uses. Once again, those people need their finances checked for unusual payments that can be traced to big pharma.
Someone is lying and someone is telling the truth when it comes to HCQ and Ivermectin. That's probably true with a lot of other meds for conditions and diseases besides Covid. I just don't know if there are any really brave and hungry independent journalists left these days. I bet there's a helluva story to be told that would implicate a lot of very respected people.
Most doctors are so intellectually lazy that if they aren't spoonfed a narrative (by pharmaceutical reps mostly) they wouldn't know what to think. Once they graduate they stop learning, so many are practicing the medicine of decades ago.
Much of what I see is group think. The system doesn't reward physicians who step out of line. Their world is all about peer review, protocols, not running afoul of licensing boards, attending conferences at resort destinations paid for by big pharma where they rub elbows with their colleagues whose approval they desperately need and want. In that environment, patient safety can be marginalized by conformity at a time like today where those that dared speak up about leaky vaccines, antibody dependent enhancement, etc. and warned that mass inoculation during a pandemic can create the exact types of variants we see today. This default stance to defer to protocols or use very expensive drugs when low cost over-the-counter alternatives like HCQ and Ivermectin could mitigate the disease if people are infected and reduce the need for hospitalization while allowing people to obtain natural immunity that is proving to be far superior to the vaccines.
Chlorine dioxide is AMAZING. Works very quickly. Way faster than antibiotics, and deals with every pathogen - bacterial and viral - up to and including the rona and MRSA.
Here’s some others!
STUDY: Ivermectin is a safe and effective remedy for covid that costs less than $1 a day
New research out of Israel has found that administering the anti-parasite drug ivermectin to Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) patients may help to drastically reduce the duration of infections – and all for less than $1 a day.
Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, launched a randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial last May that evaluated the efficacy of ivermectin in reducing viral shedding among non-hospitalized Chinese Virus patients with mild to moderate infection.
That trial recently wrapped up, showing that the drug, which was first approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) back in 1987, can help to minimize the impact of the Fauci Flu both safely and effectively.
The discoverers of ivermectin, by the way, were awarded a Nobel Prize in 2015 for successfully using ivermectin to treat onchocerciasis, a disease caused by infection with a parasitic roundworm.
Over the years, it has further been revealed that ivermectin is an effective remedy against scabies and head lice, as well as a variety of viruses ranging from HIV to common influenza to Zika to West Nile.
Since a five-day course of ivermectin costs around 60 cents in the third world, and about $10 in Israel, it is a highly economical remedy that could easily put an end to the plandemic and get everyone and everything back to the old normal. Because it works so well and costs next to nothing, however, the FDA and the World Health Organization (WHO) are saying no way, José!
Since ivermectin appears to work effectively, the government doesn’t want you to have access to it
In Schwartz’s study, 89 volunteers over the age of 18 who tested “positive” for Chinese Germs were divided into two groups: one that received ivermectin and the other that received a placebo. All participants took their pills for three days in a row one hour before every meal.
Every two days and at the end of the sixth day, each volunteer was administered a standard nasopharyngeal swab PCR test, which supposedly identifies viral loads of the Fauci Flu. (NOTE: This is highly disputed now that it has been revealed ( https://t.me/naomirwolf/154 ) that PCR tests were never designed to look for the Chinese Virus, but rather for seasonal influenza.)
Even so, what this process found is that about 72 percent of all volunteers who received ivermectin tested negative for the Chinese Virus by day six. In contrast, only 50 percent of those who received the placebo tested negative.
As for the culture viability of each patient, meaning how infectious they were by the end of the regimen, a mere 13 percent of the ivermectin group was still infectious after six days compared to 50 percent in the placebo group.
“Our study shows first and foremost that ivermectin has antiviral activity,” Schwartz said.
“It also shows that there is almost a 100% chance that a person will be noninfectious in four to six days, which could lead to shortening isolation time for these people. This could have a huge economic and social impact.”
Schwartz’s study has been published on the health research sharing site MedRxiv, where it has not yet been reviewed by peers. Another study that came to similar conclusions, however, has been peer-reviewed and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
Despite claims by the establishment to the contrary, ivermectin did not show any significant side effects in Schwartz’s trial, suggesting that it is not only inexpensive but also safe and effective.
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/06000/Review_of_the_Emerging_Evidence_Demonstrating_the.4.aspx
https://ivmmeta.com/
https://t.me/naomirwolf/154
It just goes to show that there is a cheap drug that works but "They" just want to control us and/or kill us.
Imagine how pissed off fauchi and gates must have been when we figured out horsey paste
Yeah - kind of amazing that it was discovered really!
And now THEY think they can mock people into NOT taking a known coronavirus cure. Well - maybe they can convince a few liberals, but patriots are completely unaffected by their "horse paste" jokes.
Nice . Thank you. Perfect timing - will send this to my asshole FORMER doctor that is injecting his pregnant patients and making fun of the horse de-wormer. Neigh!
Thanks. Just watched this video showing the different results between Ivermectin and Remdesivir for use against Covid and it's pretty upsetting. The Chief Medical Officer of the medical group that I've been going to for the last 30 years has been publishing a newsletter every 2-4 weeks during the plandemic. In the last newsletter I received it stated that while Ivermectin showed some promise in the beginning, it seemed to lose it's effectiveness and now they've been giving patients Remdesivir. I need to find this guy's email and send him a link to this video.
great info ... have some things to discuss with my double masked doc next month
AWESOME! Thank you.
Nice post of info!
Any database for all the mRNA drug trials that killed all the lab animals?
Not that I'm aware of but here's some sauce for you on a few of them:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382 (Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus)
https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/123158 (Anti–spike IgG causes severe acute lung injury by skewing macrophage responses during acute SARS-CoV infection, pathogenic priming)
Thnx
Senate Committee Confirms That Animals Kept Dying During Covid 19 Vaccine Tests https://youtu.be/ZfOjvfjFwOg
I went to an Urgi-Care center yesterday after cutting a finger. While getting treated I spoke to the doctor who was in charge of this and 11 other clinics run my a large urban medical center. I asked specifically about Ivermectin and what he thought of it. He said it was useless. All the studies show it has no benefit. Really? I said. I mentioned a big study in Brazil and the data coming from India showing dramatic results. He just say, aha like in one ear and out the other. So I asked what exactly is the latest protocol for newly diagnosed Covid patients. He said monoclonal antibody therapy. He said all the patients he knows that used it have very good results and were better within a week.
Now here's a good example of a well intentioned doctor who read a couple of cherry picked studies from JAMA or NEJM and that was all he needed to think it didn't work. I know he never heard of the amazing results being reported globally that has been ignored by the major journals who are funded in large part by big pharma. The hospital would rather give you $3000 treatments than ones costing $20. I'm happy they have it to give people but it begs the question, why not use HCQ or Ivermectin as a preventative or early when symptoms first arise? Because their most trusted "highly respected" journals say it doesn't work. End of story.
By the time the truth is acknowledged, if ever, Pfizer and Moderna will be hundreds of $Billions richer, insurance rates will again go through the roof and we'll be on to the next pandemic. These doctors trust in the accuracy of these Journals so completely that it never occurs to them they are seeing anything but the absolute truth. So when it comes to re-imagining our health care systems, a top priority item needs to be a full investigation into the editorial and review boards of these Journals and that should include a review of their personal finances to see if there were any significant payments that can be tied back to big pharma. Then there should be investigations into those who develop and decide the protocols each hospital and clinic uses. Once again, those people need their finances checked for unusual payments that can be traced to big pharma.
Someone is lying and someone is telling the truth when it comes to HCQ and Ivermectin. That's probably true with a lot of other meds for conditions and diseases besides Covid. I just don't know if there are any really brave and hungry independent journalists left these days. I bet there's a helluva story to be told that would implicate a lot of very respected people.
Most doctors are so intellectually lazy that if they aren't spoonfed a narrative (by pharmaceutical reps mostly) they wouldn't know what to think. Once they graduate they stop learning, so many are practicing the medicine of decades ago.
Much of what I see is group think. The system doesn't reward physicians who step out of line. Their world is all about peer review, protocols, not running afoul of licensing boards, attending conferences at resort destinations paid for by big pharma where they rub elbows with their colleagues whose approval they desperately need and want. In that environment, patient safety can be marginalized by conformity at a time like today where those that dared speak up about leaky vaccines, antibody dependent enhancement, etc. and warned that mass inoculation during a pandemic can create the exact types of variants we see today. This default stance to defer to protocols or use very expensive drugs when low cost over-the-counter alternatives like HCQ and Ivermectin could mitigate the disease if people are infected and reduce the need for hospitalization while allowing people to obtain natural immunity that is proving to be far superior to the vaccines.
Good sight. I use the same link which also references:
https://c19hcq.com/
And
https://t.me/chlorinedioxidetruth/98
Chlorine dioxide is AMAZING. Works very quickly. Way faster than antibiotics, and deals with every pathogen - bacterial and viral - up to and including the rona and MRSA.
These articles have me rethinking my position! Thanks for a great posting!
...and how many on those lovely clot-shots? None that any rats lived to show the wonders.
Look what happens when you look at future Ivermectin studies by searching in clinicaltrials.gov 75 worldwide trials including Duke, Vanderbilt, Wake
hit pieces. We don't need any more data we need data on most effective dosing and toxicity just to make sure the great safety we believe.