Organized Scientific Fraud: SARS-CoV-2 is an Unrestricted Bioweapon
(www.americaoutloud.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
"If it couldn't occur naturally, how else would it happen?"
It sounds like you're still stuck in the false dichotomy. Why isn't it a viable option that "covid" doesn't exist and that the flu and the cold were hijacked, coupled with a media marketing campaign of epic proportions, and every other angle of lies they've pushed, to create the mass panic?
Once this option is eliminated, then you have a true "If not this, then that" dichotomy.
"Have you seen all the reports about Fauci funding gain-of-function research? What do you think that was all about?"
Good question. Yes, I have. What we see, however, is merely all the "attempts" and investments made into GoF research, but we haven't seen any cold hard facts regarding their succeeding.
If "covid" was, indeed, isolated, then the man made sequences would be EASILY exposed, but those man made sequences have not been exposed - only from a computer generated model, not an actual, isolated virus sample.
I think Trump forced their hand for sure - in more ways than one. One of those ways was in the fact that they didn't have the actual virus ready yet (another reason for wanting 5 more years of lockdowns). So they had there little Event 201 round table meeting, and moved forward with their "simulated" pandemic. This, at minimum, explains why there haven't been any Flu deaths or Cold deaths (the death counts were hijacked and moved over to the "covid" column), and all the inflated numbers, incentivized doctors, faulty tests, etc etc...
Good discussion, Fren. :)
"It sounds like you're still stuck in the false dichotomy. Why isn't it a viable option that "covid" doesn't exist and that the flu and the cold were hijacked, coupled with a media marketing campaign of epic proportions, and every other angle of lies they've pushed, to create the mass panic?"
I know an ER doc who, in the early days of the virus, talked about symptoms he'd never seen before, especially blood clots in the lungs, which led to the use of ventilators. He acknowledged that comorbidities made a significant contribution to the patient's outcome. He initially seemed stumped by what they were seeing and later said they had to come up with a new protocol to treat it: Hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin and a third item, which IIRC was zinc.
I agree that Trump forced their hand, that the flu and cold were hijacked, that the media campaign created the public reaction of absolute fear and terror, and that the pandemic was simulated (hoaxed). However, based on the ER doc's experience, I believe that some new disease has been floating around, that it was likely created in a lab, that it's relatively harmless to anyone healthy, and that, just like the regular flu, it's only a significant problem for someone whose body is already debilitated by comorbidities and/or a weakened immune system. I also believe that the deaths of the relatively young and otherwise healthy who've gone to a hospital with this disease are a result of the Remdesivir and ventilator treatments being inflicted on them by corrupt practitioners at all levels of the system.
If I didn't know this ER doc, I'd probably agree with you 100%. I do agree that this has been a good discussion. 😺
Blood clots in the Lungs and H1N1:
https://vascular.org/news-advocacy/jvs-report-swine-flu-and-respiratory-distress-linked-blood-clots
Blood clotting with RSV's is not that surprising:
https://www.wired.com/story/covid-19s-scary-blood-clots-arent-that-surprising/
Your Dr friend would have to show how/why the clotting he is seeing is different than the clotting that has already been witnessed in already existing coronaviruses and influenza illnesses.
It seemed different to him. He went into some details about it, but that was months ago and I don't remember, and I'm not a medical expert to be able to judge the value of what he said in terms that would convince you.
We'll just have to agree to disagree.
No I understand. It's just that anecdotal evidence doesn't make for very strong evidence.
I really good piece of evidence would be for the isolated virus to be shared with labs around the world for analysis. But this has not been done.