A cutting, often ironic remark intended to express contempt or ridicule.
Using the phrase "Democrat poll adjustment" was obviously exactly such an cutting remark intended to express contempt or ridicule for the all too common democratic lean to all polls used by a biased and outright fraudulent media. The use of the word "bots" fit into that same category of sarcasm. Your inability to understand sarcasm doesn't reflect on my ability to express it. But just because you don't understand it, when I tell you it is that, don't turn around and tell me it isn't.
Denying reality and warping reality isn't going to do the movement any favors
I told you that it was sarcasm. I don't think there is anyone here except you that thought it otherwise. You denying the reality of its sarcastic nature and warping reality to fit your contempt if my "mathematical illiteracy" isn't going to do the movement any favors.
I do mathematical analysis and modeling for a living, so I get it a little bit. I do analysis of data all the time, sometimes even polling data, so I get that a little bit too.
The simple fact you believe 2-4 point polling errors are "fraud" is just another example of trying to warp reality.
Where do you even get these assumptions? When did I ever say anything that even remotely comes close to this statement of your beliefs of my beliefs?
Which polls are you talking about specifically? Like dude, what the holy fuck are you even talking about?
I think we are pretty much done here. You have taken things completely out of context and tried to make a mountain out of a molehill. I don't wish to engage in this inane endeavor today. I am too busy.
Do you know what sarcasm is?
Using the phrase "Democrat poll adjustment" was obviously exactly such an cutting remark intended to express contempt or ridicule for the all too common democratic lean to all polls used by a biased and outright fraudulent media. The use of the word "bots" fit into that same category of sarcasm. Your inability to understand sarcasm doesn't reflect on my ability to express it. But just because you don't understand it, when I tell you it is that, don't turn around and tell me it isn't.
I told you that it was sarcasm. I don't think there is anyone here except you that thought it otherwise. You denying the reality of its sarcastic nature and warping reality to fit your contempt if my "mathematical illiteracy" isn't going to do the movement any favors.
I do mathematical analysis and modeling for a living, so I get it a little bit. I do analysis of data all the time, sometimes even polling data, so I get that a little bit too.
Where do you even get these assumptions? When did I ever say anything that even remotely comes close to this statement of your beliefs of my beliefs?
Which polls are you talking about specifically? Like dude, what the holy fuck are you even talking about?
I think we are pretty much done here. You have taken things completely out of context and tried to make a mountain out of a molehill. I don't wish to engage in this inane endeavor today. I am too busy.