I came at this from a different angle than a lot of people. I didn't know who was on the flight, and I never looked at the passenger manifest for a couple of years. I'm simply a passionate amateur airplane accident investigator who spends several hours a month on the subject as a hobby.
I read the reports, studied the data, read the transcripts and managed to listen to the audio of the CVR and I know without a shadow of a doubt what happened to that flight.
Look, I fully understand the skepticism of people coming at this from the other direction. They know that 9/11 was a false flag attack, then they hear about a lady who has turned down government payoffs and has been pushing for a truth commission... and then she dies the day after she meets with Obama.
If that isn't conspiracy level stuff, then I don't know what is. If I had come at it from that direction, then I'd believe it too. It's very difficult to sort through the noise and look into literally every death and conspiracy available.
All I'm asking is that people be willing to look at both sides of an argument and then please choose the side with the preponderance of evidence... and I'm telling you that the preponderance of evidence in this case is for an accidental crash.
I came at this from a different angle than a lot of people. I didn't know who was on the flight, and I never looked at the passenger manifest for a couple of years. I'm simply a passionate amateur airplane accident investigator who spends several hours a month on the subject as a hobby.
I read the reports, studied the data, read the transcripts and managed to listen to the audio of the CVR and I know without a shadow of a doubt what happened to that flight.
Look, I fully understand the skepticism of people coming at this from the other direction. They know that 9/11 was a false flag attack, then they hear about a lady who has turned down government payoffs and has been pushing for a truth commission... and then she dies the day after she meets with Obama.
If that isn't conspiracy level stuff, then I don't know what is. If I had come at it from that direction, then I'd believe it too. It's very difficult to sort through the noise and look into literally every death and conspiracy available.
All I'm asking is that people be willing to look at both sides of an argument and then please choose the side with the preponderance of evidence... and I'm telling you that the preponderance of evidence in this case is for an accidental crash.