Me: The Gov is corrupt. Shills: Do you have a source on that?
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
Even when you provide a peer reviewed source, they still argue.
Of course. Was it peer reviewed by a peer reviewed group who first passed peer review status? What credentials (specifically) do they have? And from what universities? Come on, man. Even cornpop wants the creds.
I have a Masters Degree and have done many studies and I can say this for sure:
There isn’t a study on 99% of life; only 1%. So finding studies isn’t always possible.
Very few things can be proven. Everything else is speculation based on common sense.
Many studies are intentionally sku’d to mess up the results. There is data that must be omitted but since they leave it in there, it messes up the truthful results.
Many scientists are paid to report bs.
Data results change often because there are too many changing variables in life so a study might say one thing one day and something different years later.
Common sense cannot be ignored when figuring out truth. Since few things can be proven, we must depend on our intuition to formulate answers for us. It is very accurate because it gathers all knowledge that the conscious mind cannot and formulates a result. The reason people make errors is because they mix up thinking and intuition. Thinking up ideas is actually faulty so the thinking part of the mind and intuitive part complete to figure stuff out. The key is to focus on the intuitive part. This is best done by creating courses on how to do this and then training school children and adults to do this daily. It’s something that builds with practice.
Personal bias always interferes with final study results.