OK. So, here is how I would handle things if I were in that situation.

1. They have not made any specific demand, yet. Therefore, it is too early to show an aggressive response. A concerned stance would be more appropriate at this time.

2. For now, I would send an email to my immediate supervisor, and ask that it be forwarded to the appropriate people for answers. My email would be asking the supervisor if he/she knows what management knows. Of course, there is no way for the supervisor to be able to know that, so they will have to forward it to their supervisor and/or legal department. That is what you want. At the same time, you are alerting anyone who reads it (supervisor, upper managment, legal department, anyone) of key issues that they might not know (such as vaccine harm). These people most likely have NO CLUE what the actual facts are on the science of these vaccines. This is an opportunity to put the scare into them by dropping some red pills. At the same time, I would want them to know that if they try to steam roll this thing through, that they are going to have MAJOR legal issues that they might not be thinking will be a real problem. I would want to set things up for the next round, if necessary.

That email would be something like:

• I understand the company is considering a policy related to a vaccine mandate of some sort.
• Does management know that thousands of people have suffered harm after taking various drugs touted as Covid vaccines, including death?
• Has managment looked at the federal government's data in the VAERS reporting system?
• Does management know that more people have died after taking these vaccines than all vaccines over the past 30 years, combined?
• Has managment read the Pfizer clinical trial? If so, they should know that the Pfizer trial only lasted 28 days, rather than the required 2-year minimum for a Phase III trial, and that it showed no benefit as to preventing anyone from getting Covid, or preventing anyone from spreading Covid. How could management mandate a harmful drug?
• Does management know that the FDA approval for the Pfizer drug is not yet complete, due to additional testing and requirments from Pfizer that have not yet been fulfilled, and that their "approved" drug is not available to the public at this time, and may never become available if Pfizer does not complete its requirements?
• Does management know that if they decide not to institute a vaccine mandate, that they would have no legal liability because no employee who got Covid could prove in a court of law that they got it from someone in the company? Because they would have no proof of how they got Covid, they could not successfully sue the company if the company left the situation as is, status quo?
• On the other hand, does management know that if they do institute a vaccine mandate, and require it under threat of termination of employment, that that could be construed as criminal coersion and deprivation of rights? If they rely on false information provided by the CDC or NIH, it could also be fraud. Have they discussed this?

3. This email will have to be forwarded by the supervisor to someone else up the chain of command, which is what you want. If you don't get a response within 48 hours, it might then be worth forwarding a copy to the CEO and legal department, telling them that you asked your supervisor about some issues that are of great concern, and maybe they would be better able to answer the questions.

See? It is not being demanding. It is just being concerned and asking questions. But the questions are also red pills (hey -- they might not know about this stuff), and at the same time any lawyer will realize that they could have a MAJOR legal problem on their hands.

Now, if the corporation is run by politically-connected "insiders" (leftists and RINOS's) then they might not give a damn. It is quite possible that the leftists/communists are planning on getting rigged court decisions by corrupt judges to back their actions. So, they might go ahead and implement the mandate and be ready for lawsuits. Just be aware. None of us know what their next evil plan is, or how corrupt the courts are.

4. If, and only if, they actually issue the vaxx mandate, then I would send emails to everyone in the chain of command and the legal department that include the things in my previous post -- the more aggressive tone. I would immediately follow that up with certified letters (return receipt) to the CEO, legal department, the vice president of your division, and each member of the Board of Directors. If I did not know how to get them those letters, I would send them to the registered agent, which can be looked up online for the state where the corporation is domiciled (where it was originally created) -- probably Delaware or the state where the HQ is, but you have to look it up to find out.

In that email/letter, I would include the language I had earlier upthread about felony crimes, etc. But I would not include that right now, because they have not jumped the shark, just yet.

This email right now is just asking questions about whether or not management has discussed these things. If they ignore your concerns, that shows bad faith and could also be negligence.

Later, you get tougher. All of this is establishing a RECORD. That is the whole point of this. Just like Q said, nothing matters in court unless you can PROVE it.

By asking questions, and them refusing to answer, you are establishing that YOU are acting in good faith, trying to do the right thing, and THEY are not.

If you get an honest judge and jury, you SHOULD win in the end. If you hire an attorney, your emails and letters will be pure gold to him, because that is evidence he can use in court that they are the bad guys.

I hope that make sense.

P.S. Another idea would be to print out this email and show it to other employees that you know well and ask what they think. You don't really care what they think, so much as you want them to be informed of the potential harm, and feel out who might be on your side. The more fellow employees who become informed about the dangers, the more power the employees have to stop it.