Follow up: How is recommending taking a vaccine (that he "helped develop"/"pushed to be developed") to be seen as a neutral stance? (by angry scorned leftists with vax regret).
I pray that Trump hasn't stepped on a rake here. Really wish he'd STFU about "his administration's" vaccine.
Not seeing the tactical genius here in this one, singular, very specific spot.
Why go on at length about how YOU were the one who made the vaccine (clot shot, political detriment) happen, and then tack on "but people should be free" right on the end as an afterthought, while people drop like flies?
Why not go on at length about personal freedoms, incite huge pro America boners and then humbly admit you were the ones who made the choice possible.
Say we give you pass, and you can just not mention all of the amputated limbs, bell's palsies, myocarditis, miscarriages and etc?
But srsly? WTF TRUMP??!? Stop sucking off the VAX! Fuck man this shit is 1 part pandemic to 10 parts dishonesty propaganda from everyone including DJT and the Media!
Let's hypothesize. Let's assume that the vaccine isn't as dangerous as we think it is and is merely the tool to either force division / introduce digital ID / provoke civil war or violence to justify a police state or any other similar nefarious reason. In that scenario, spreading false information about the dangers of vaccines would play into furthering division, because if people just generally accepted it and deemed it relatively safe there would be no need for divisive measures against unvaccinated, there wouldn't be enough fear. But if people are afraid of vaccines by the same fear mongering as it exists on the pro vaccine side, then tribalism really kicks in, tensions are high etc. Now let's say Trump was aware of the vaccine being used as a tool to create division: he'd keep stating very clearly that he was pro vaccine but against being forced, coerced, etc and that freedom of choice is absolutely paramount. That way people can't say: oh he's an anti vaxxer, that's why he's against the vaccine passport. Because the message is stronger if you have been vaccinated and believe in it but make a stand for unvaccinated: unity, not division.
Just a theory, not impossible.
I'm concerned this is going to backfire in a major way. We're playing a game of lies and dishonesty here, and I remember being told to tell the truth, even when it hurts.
It's especially embarrassing when someone who claims to tell the truth is caught up in a lie. That's my concern for Trump.
Good theory. There is also the theory that no-one likes to think about but which should be considered in reserve (not a theory I myself subscribe to at this juncture): Trump is cabal-owned and is playing a role in the psyop to help deliver the depop, Great Reset, death to USA etc fuckery to keep dissenters hopeful about “white hats” and forever at their keyboards doing “research”…
Yeah, there's that possibility too. Like you, I do revisit it every so often but don't believe in it. While there may not be white hats, the things Q has unveiled for many speaks against it for me. But if they were very sure that no one would ever be able to hold them accountable, they might pull something like that in a 6D chess move. It's not impossible but in my humble opinion unlikely.