Well, sure, I'll do your research for you. Although I fail to see why this was beyond your own capabilities.
She doesn't actually make any claims until about halfway through, so let's start there.
She refers to a COVID particle as a "COVID micron" which immediately calls into question her expertise. A micron is a specific unit of size equal to a micrometer. It's not a way to indicate a discrete viral unit. A COVID particle is equal to 0.1 microns, so she's already using the terminology incorrectly for an "expert".
Any indication that this is too small for a mask to filter is wrong, because COVID particles do not float around on their own. They're stuck to other molecules, usually water, which can absolutely be caught by masks.
She is correct that many people touch their masks. That's a behavioral problem, not a problem with the masks. People unable to use masks properly is not an indication that masks don't work. Just like people misusing guns to commit mass shootings are not demonstrating that guns don't work.
She was also right that setting the mask on the desk wasn't a good look. Also means nothing as evidence.
I have no problems with implementing other means of viral control. Again, saying that something else works doesn't indicate that masks do not.
Was there some other groundbreaking point she made that you think can't be responded to? Because over half the video was her insisting she's an expert, and really only the one major evidence-based claim which, as I see, is not actually evidenced.
Verify, then trust. That's how you avoid being taken in by non-experts claiming to be experts. Even if you think the whole media is out to get you, it's still worth at LEAST seeing what they have to say before claiming victory.
I don’t understand why you ask for an outside opinion of me, and when I provide it, you inevitably fall back on how the Cabal can’t be trusted and everything on my side is lies from them and so forth.
The only thing worse than immediately trusting anything from Google is immediately distrusting anything that is within Google’s reach.
I identity my opposition based on them being against my positions. I don’t identify my positions based on my opposition taking the opposite opinions. That’s not scientific.
And keep in mind I’m not trying to convince you of anything. I’m telling you why nobody is experiencing the Great Awakening based solely on you telling everyone that the Cabal is Everywhere and Lying about Everything.
I don't know how many times that I insist to you that the television has nothing to do with my opinions. I don't even have cable. And nothing I read I do so unquestioningly.
Google believes the sky is blue and the Earth is round. Are you now obligated to take the opposite position because a search engine brings up results on this?
Have you considered that perhaps I'm not typing, "counter argument to quelle" into Google to get my sources?
Again, I know it is extremely threatening to the concept of a Great Awakening if someone can be a critical thinker and be capable of pulling legitimate arguments from the "evil media", but that's what critical thinkers do.
We assume NO resource is completely, 100% unbiased. Not one.
But critical thinkers don't toss out the baby with the bathwater. Critical thinking is knowing how to analyze sources to identify falsifiable information, and then how to independently verify those particular claims. Regardless of where they came from.
As I did with Ms. Kelly here.
There is no situation in which accusing someone of being brainwashed is a valid and productive means of having a conversation. Which is why I have literally never accused you of being brainwashed, even though I would say that cherry-picking your sources and assuming anything that disagrees with you is the nefarious work of the Cabal is FAR more shallow in research effort than anything I've ever offered here.
Well, sure, I'll do your research for you. Although I fail to see why this was beyond your own capabilities.
She doesn't actually make any claims until about halfway through, so let's start there.
She refers to a COVID particle as a "COVID micron" which immediately calls into question her expertise. A micron is a specific unit of size equal to a micrometer. It's not a way to indicate a discrete viral unit. A COVID particle is equal to 0.1 microns, so she's already using the terminology incorrectly for an "expert".
Any indication that this is too small for a mask to filter is wrong, because COVID particles do not float around on their own. They're stuck to other molecules, usually water, which can absolutely be caught by masks.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/06/11/fact-check-n-95-filters-not-too-large-stop-covid-19-particles/5343537002/
She is correct that many people touch their masks. That's a behavioral problem, not a problem with the masks. People unable to use masks properly is not an indication that masks don't work. Just like people misusing guns to commit mass shootings are not demonstrating that guns don't work.
She was also right that setting the mask on the desk wasn't a good look. Also means nothing as evidence.
I have no problems with implementing other means of viral control. Again, saying that something else works doesn't indicate that masks do not.
Was there some other groundbreaking point she made that you think can't be responded to? Because over half the video was her insisting she's an expert, and really only the one major evidence-based claim which, as I see, is not actually evidenced.
Verify, then trust. That's how you avoid being taken in by non-experts claiming to be experts. Even if you think the whole media is out to get you, it's still worth at LEAST seeing what they have to say before claiming victory.
I don’t understand why you ask for an outside opinion of me, and when I provide it, you inevitably fall back on how the Cabal can’t be trusted and everything on my side is lies from them and so forth.
The only thing worse than immediately trusting anything from Google is immediately distrusting anything that is within Google’s reach.
I identity my opposition based on them being against my positions. I don’t identify my positions based on my opposition taking the opposite opinions. That’s not scientific.
And keep in mind I’m not trying to convince you of anything. I’m telling you why nobody is experiencing the Great Awakening based solely on you telling everyone that the Cabal is Everywhere and Lying about Everything.
I don't know how many times that I insist to you that the television has nothing to do with my opinions. I don't even have cable. And nothing I read I do so unquestioningly.
Google believes the sky is blue and the Earth is round. Are you now obligated to take the opposite position because a search engine brings up results on this?
Have you considered that perhaps I'm not typing, "counter argument to quelle" into Google to get my sources?
Again, I know it is extremely threatening to the concept of a Great Awakening if someone can be a critical thinker and be capable of pulling legitimate arguments from the "evil media", but that's what critical thinkers do.
We assume NO resource is completely, 100% unbiased. Not one.
But critical thinkers don't toss out the baby with the bathwater. Critical thinking is knowing how to analyze sources to identify falsifiable information, and then how to independently verify those particular claims. Regardless of where they came from.
As I did with Ms. Kelly here.
There is no situation in which accusing someone of being brainwashed is a valid and productive means of having a conversation. Which is why I have literally never accused you of being brainwashed, even though I would say that cherry-picking your sources and assuming anything that disagrees with you is the nefarious work of the Cabal is FAR more shallow in research effort than anything I've ever offered here.